摘要
2005年新修订的公司法第183条规定了股东可以提起解散公司之诉的司法解散,为股东提供了一种新的救济途径,也为法官审判提供了法律依据。在尊重公司自治、防止股东机会主义以及司法适当干预方面,立法做了许多努力。但与发达国家公司法相比,仍存在需要考究的部分,如法院解散裁判问题、恶意诉讼问题以及诉讼担保和公司维持经营问题。
Judicial dissolution of company is at once a new relief for the shareholders and a legal excuse for courts to make decisions. Many efforts have been made on respecting corporate autonomy, preventing evil litigations and involving the cases properly. However, comparing with that of developed countries, we still have much to do, such as the verdicts of dissolution of company, evil litigations and the preserving of company. Therefore, we must try to find any substitute recovery means to save the company, do our best to prevent the evil litigations and give any ways to protect the interests of any walks.
出处
《青海师专学报》
2008年第3期56-59,共4页
Journal of Qinghai Junior Teachers' College
关键词
替代方法
恶意诉讼
股东公司
the substitute recovery means
evil litigaion
the dissolution of company