期刊文献+

范畴三段论推理的表征与影响因素研究 被引量:2

An Experimental Study on the Representation and Influencing Factors of Categorical Syllogism Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用纸笔测验法对大学生如何进行范畴三段论推理进行了初步探讨。被试为123名大学生。研究发现:(1)人们在范畴三段论推理中一般有图形(像)的参与,且明晰的图形提示有助于推理成绩的提高;(2)影响范畴三段论推理的因素主要有前提能够建构的模型的数目、前提的内容、前提的格(格效应)和推理者自身(文理科、知识背景等)因素。具体而言,图示只对纯符号推理题有提高作用,理科学生只在文字内容推理题上显著高于文科学生;(3)对前提的不完全解释是产生推理错误的重要原因之一。 This paper probed into how people did categorical syllogism reaching by using paper-pencil test. The research was administered to 123 freshmen. The results showed that (1)People preferred to use some figures during the categorical syllogism reasoning process and clear figures were helpful to improving reasoning performances; (2)Some main factors affected categorical syllogism reasoning: the number of the models which the premises could construct, the contents of the premises, the figures of syllogism (effects of the figures) and the subjects themselves(major and background knowledge). To be specific, figures only had suggestive effects for pure symbol reasoning tests; students majoring in science did better than majoring in liberal arts. (3) An incomplete explanation of the premises was the major cause for incorrect reasoning .
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期532-535,552,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(05JZD00034)的资助
关键词 推理 范畴三段论 表征 影响因素 reasoning, categories syllogism, representation, influencing factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Braine M P S.On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic.Psychological Review,1978,85:1-21.
  • 2Braine M P S,O'brien D P.Mental logic.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Publishers,1998.
  • 3毕鸿燕,方格,王桂琴,杨小冬.演绎推理中的心理模型理论及相关研究[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):595-596. 被引量:11
  • 4Johnson-Laird P N.Mental models:Towards a cognitive science of language,inference,and consciousness.Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1983:39-87.
  • 5Johnson-Laird P N,Byrne RMJ.Deduction.Hove,UK:L.Erlbaum Associates,1991:30-58.
  • 6胡竹菁.推理心理研究中的逻辑加工与非逻辑加工评析[J].心理科学,2002,25(3):318-321. 被引量:12
  • 7王沛,李晶.范畴三段论推理中信念偏差效应的实验研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(6):1020-1024. 被引量:6
  • 8Klauer K C,Musch J,Naumer B.On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.Psychologiscal Review,2000,107(4):852-884.
  • 9Johnson-Larid PN,Steedman M.The Psychology of Syllogisms.Cognitive Psychology,1978,10:64-99.
  • 10Chapman L J & Chapman A P.Atmosphere effect reexamined.Journal of Experimental Psychology,1959,58 ; 220-226.

二级参考文献33

  • 1毕鸿燕,方格.4—6岁幼儿空间方位传递性推理能力的发展[J].心理学报,2001,33(3):238-243. 被引量:14
  • 2Wilkins M C. The effect of changed material on the ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning. Archives of Psychology,1928,102: 1 - 83.
  • 3Begg I, Denny J P. Empirical reconciliation of atmosphere and conversion interpretations of syllogistic reasoning errors.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81:351 -354.
  • 4Dickstein L S. The effect of figure on syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6:76 - 83.
  • 5Oakhill J V, Johnson- Laird P N. The effects of belief on the spontaneous production of syllogistic conclusions.Quarterly Joumalof Experimental Psychology,1 985,37:553-569.
  • 6Evans J ST B T. Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaun,1989.
  • 7Evans J ST B T., Pollard P. Belief bias and problem complexity in deductive reasoning. In Cavernie J P, Fabre J M, Gonzalez M (Eds.), Cognitive biases, 131 - 154,Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990.
  • 8Johnson- Laird P N. Mental models, Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press, 1983.
  • 9Newstead S E , Evans J St B T. Mental models as an explanation of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning.Cognition, 1993,46:93 - 97.
  • 10Klauer K C, Musch J, Naumer B. On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review. 2000,107 (4):852 - 884.

共引文献24

同被引文献39

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部