期刊文献+

国有商业银行操作风险控制绩效模型实证研究--基于探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析角度的检验 被引量:14

The Empirical Study on Performance Model of Operational Risk Domination of National Commercial Bank:Based on Research Corner of EFA and CFA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 巴塞尔银行监管委员会发布的新巴塞尔资本协议框架已进入实施阶段,这不仅是对全球范围内金融监管准则的新发展,更是对监管机构和金融机构的风险管理提出的更高要求。2006年,新协议将风险控制确立为银行经营的核心内容,而操作风险控制正变为国际银行业风险控制的首要目标。在新巴塞尔协议风险计量规则与风险控制理论的指导下,建立科学的商业银行操作风险控制绩效测度模型,可以有效地提高中国商业银行的风险控制绩效。因子分析可以对绩效模型的合理性和可靠性提供实证检验,并由此揭示中国商业银行操作风险管理过程中存在的若干现实性问题。 The Basel Accord has been entered the operational phrase, which not only improves the advancement of monetary auditing regulation, but also incurs the higher management request for monetary organization and auditing banking organization. The New Basel Committee takes the management of operational risk as the center contents of industry and the management of operational risk has become the primary task for risk administration. The establishment of measurement index system for management performance of operation risk is the prerequisite of defending it effectively according to the regulation of risk measure of the New Basel Committee. The FA may provide valid and reasonable certification for measure index system, and also may find many actual problems about management of operational risk in Chinese commercial banking.
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第3期36-43,共8页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70771087)
关键词 国有商业银行 操作风险计量 业务流程优化 结构方程模型 national commercial bank operation risk measure business process adjustment structure equation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1郭晓星.银行操作风险问题研究[J].世界经济情况,2007(4):12-14. 被引量:2
  • 2SHERWOOD J. Operational risk key problems with the advanced measurement approach [ J ]. Journal of American Money, 1999 (2) :132 - 141.
  • 3MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER. Measure and Managing Operational Risk in Financial Institutions: Tools, Techniques and Other Resources [ M ]. New York: John Wiley & Sons,2001.
  • 4JORION, PHILIPPE. Value at Risk: the New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk [ M ]. London : Routledge Corporation, 2004.
  • 5CRUZ M. Operational risk model structure research [ J]. Financial Theory and Practice, 2002(3) :119 - 125.
  • 6KLUGMAN, PANJER, WILLMOT. Loss Models : from data to decision [ M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998: 119 - 123.
  • 7KING J L. Operational risk: measurement and modeling [ M ]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. , 2001.
  • 8JORION, PHILIPPE. Value at Risk: the new benchmark for managing financial risk [ M ]. London. Mcgraw - Hill Corporation, 2001.
  • 9侯杰泰 成子娟 钟财文.结构方程式之拟合优度概念及常用指数之比较.教育心理学报(香港),1996,(6):21-29.

二级参考文献1

共引文献14

同被引文献112

引证文献14

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部