期刊文献+

基于CVM的民勤绿洲生态系统服务价值评估 被引量:15

Ecosystem Services Value Estimates of Minqin Oasis Based on Contingent Valuation Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在调查石羊河下游生态环境状况的基础上,以非市场物品和服务价值评估的理论-条件价值评估法为依据,以支付卡方法设计了500份调查问卷,实地考察石羊河全流域居民对民勤绿洲生态系统服务退化的补偿意愿,对影响居民支付意愿的影响因素进行了相关分析,提出了在西北地区评估生态服务价值时改进条件价值评估法的一些措施。研究结果表明:全流域68.83%的居民家庭对民勤绿洲生态环境恶化存在补偿意愿,平均最小补偿意愿每户每年为263.06元,民勤绿洲生态环境恶化的经济损失每年至少在1.115×108元以上,未来20年内,在不考虑生态效益折旧的前提下,民勤绿洲生态系统的总服务价值至少为22.3×108元。由于民勤绿洲生态环境恶化具有巨大的负外部效应,因此,仅就石羊河流域居民家庭数量计算得到的民勤绿洲生态环境恶化经济损失,只是对民勤绿洲生态环境恶化的经济损失的保守估计。 The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is a direct interview approach that can be used to provide acceptable measures of the economic value of recreation opportunities as well as preservation of natural resources. The contingent valuation methods use simulated (hypothetical) markets to identify values similar to actual markets. The experience gained in U S and Europe for about three decades showed that CV was a promising technique which could potentially help public decision making. Lots of empirical studies conducted in various contexts showed that the approach was well accepted by the general public. The research took Minqin Oasis as to analyze the loss of the economic benefits of degenerated ecosystem service in an impaired river basin, Shiyang river basin, which is the third large inland river basin in northwest China. To obtain accurate The loss of benefit estimated by using CVM technique required The detailed descriptions of the resources being valued.
出处 《干旱区资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期31-36,共6页 Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基金 国家基础科学人才培养基金冰川学冻土学特殊学科点基金(项目号J0630966) 国家科技支撑课题(项目号2007BAD46B08) 甘肃省自然基金(项目号3ZS041-A25-002) 甘肃省教育厅项目(项目号011-03)资助
关键词 条件价值评估法 补偿意愿 生态系统服务价值 民勤绿洲 CVM WTA value of eco - system services Minqin Oasis Shiyang River basin
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 12000-2004年民勤县统计年鉴[M].
  • 2张学杰.遏制民勤沙漠化趋势的思路与对策[J].甘肃水利水电技术,2005,41(4):320-321. 被引量:2
  • 3Davis R K. Recreation planning as an economic problem[J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1963, (3) :239 -249.
  • 4张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1918-1926. 被引量:324
  • 5傅伯杰,刘世梁,马克明.生态系统综合评价的内容与方法[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1885-1892. 被引量:256
  • 6Loomis J B,Walsh R G. Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs[ M]. 2nd edition. Pennsylvania:Venture Publishing Inc, 1997.
  • 7Mitchell D C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method[ M]. Washington D C: Resources for the Future, 1989.
  • 8Anthony F, Krutilla J. Determination of optimal capacity of resource -based recreation facilities [ J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1972, (12) : 417-444.
  • 9Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional frame work. In : Bateman I J and Willis K Ged. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the U S, EU, and Developing Countries [ M ]. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 10石坂隆.黄砂[J].天气,1981,28(3):651-653.

二级参考文献15

共引文献570

同被引文献201

引证文献15

二级引证文献180

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部