期刊文献+

61例老年不可切除胰头癌临床治疗分析

Clinical Analyses of 61 Cases of Senility Cancer of the Head of Pancreas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不可切除老年胰头癌患者低毒有效的临床治疗模式。方法61例老年不可切除胰头癌患者均接受胆肠吻合术。术后随机分为3组:A组22例术后给予吉西他滨(GEM)单药化疗2~4周期;B组20例给予GEM加5-氟脲嘧啶(5-FU)联合化疗2~4周期;C组19例给予GEM加顺氯氨铂(DDP)联合化疗2~4周期。观察3组患者临床受益反应及不良反应发生情况,随访统计半年、1年生存率。结果61例患者术后黄疸有不同程度减退。A、B、C组临床受益率分别为68.2%、50.0%、57.9%。A、B、C组的半年生存率分别为63.6%、60.0%、63.2%;A、B、C组的1年生存率分别为36.4%、35.0%、42.1%。结论老年不可切除胰头癌患者行胆肠吻合术后GEM单药化疗有确切疗效,且毒性小,患者可很好耐受。以GEM为主的联合化疗未能较单药提高生存率,原因有待于进一步探讨。 Objective To observe the effects of multi-treatment of senility cancer of the head of pancreas. Methods Sixty--one cases of senility cancer of the head of pancreas were divided into three groups: group A was given chemotherapy of gemcitabine; group B was combined chemo- therapy of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil; group C was combine-chemotherapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin. All three groups were treated for 2--4 weeks. The clinical benefit response(CBR), side--effects, and the rates of 6--month-- and one--year--survival were observed. Results The CBRs of groups A,B,C were 68.2% ,50.0% and 57.9% respectively. The half-year survival rates of groups A,B,C were 63. 6%, 60. 0% and 63. 2%o respectively; the 1-year survival rates of groups A, B, C were 36.4 %, 35.0 % and 42.1% respectively. Conclusion GEM showed a definite therapeutic effect with little side--effect in senility cancer of the head of pancreas. The patients could be bear the treatment.
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2008年第5期52-54,共3页 Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词 胰头癌 吉西他滨 临床分析 cancer of the head of pancreas gemcitabine clinical analyses
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学[M]6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.267-268.
  • 2孙燕,周际昌.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:568-569.
  • 3王晓稼.抗肿瘤新药吉西他滨临床研究进展[J].肿瘤学杂志,2005,11(1):69-71. 被引量:26
  • 4徐家廉.健择和晚期胰腺癌[J].中国癌症杂志,2000,10(5):434-437. 被引量:28
  • 5Ko A H, Tempero M A. Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer[J]. J Natl Compr CancNetw,2005,3 (5) : 627-636.
  • 6Burris HA. Recent Updates on the Role of Chemoxherapy in Pancreatic Cancer[J]. Semin Oncol, 2005,32 (4 suppl 6) : s1- s3.
  • 7Berlin J D,Catalano P,Thomas J P,et al. Phase Ⅲ Study of Gemcitabine in Combination with Fluorouracil Ersus Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Adanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: Estern Cooperatie Oncology Group Trial E2297[J].J Clin Oncol,2002,20 : a270-a275.
  • 8张群华,倪泉兴,张延龄.应加大胰腺癌诊治研究的力度[J].中华医学杂志,2002,82(6):361-362. 被引量:14

二级参考文献29

  • 1张天泽 徐光炜.肿瘤学[M].天津:天津技术出版社,1998.1402.
  • 2IALT(The International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group). Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected Non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004,350:351-360.
  • 3Scagliotti GV, Fossati R, Torri V, et al. Randomized study of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected stageⅠ , Ⅱ, or Ⅲ A Non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003, 95: 1453-1461.
  • 4Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-smallcell lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002,346(2):92-98.
  • 5Manegold C. Gemcitabine (Gemzar) in non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther,2004,4(3):345-360.
  • 6Dimopoulou I, Efstathiou E, Samakovli A, et al. A prospective study on lung toxicity in patients treated with gemcitabine and carboplatin: clinical, radiological and functional assessment[J]. Ann Oncol, 2004, 15(8):1250-1255.
  • 7Comella P, Frasci G, Carnicelli P, et al. Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients[J]. Br J Cancer, 2004, 13: [Epub ahead of print] .
  • 8Park YH, Lee JC, Kim CH, et al. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer after treatment with paclitaxel plus platinum [J].Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2004, 34(5):245-249.
  • 9Laack E, Dickgreber N, Muller T, et al. German and Swiss Lung Cancer Study Group. Randomized phase Ⅲstudy of gemcitabine and vinorelbine versus gemcitabine,vinorelbine, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: from the German and SwissLung Cancer Study Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(12):2348-2356.
  • 10Georgoulias V, Kouroussis C, Agelidou A,et al. Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre,randomised, phase Ⅱ study[J].Br J Cancer, 2004, [Epub ahead of print].

共引文献517

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部