期刊文献+

反垄断法与上架费的法律规制 被引量:1

The Anti-monopoly Law and the Regulation of Slotting Allowance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 超市收取上架费是产品分销中零售商对供应商拥有相对优势地位的结果,是零售商相对优势地位滥用的表现。上架费的竞争法规制应建立在合理分析基础之上。在经济分析不能提供明确答案的情况下,竞争和消费者利益应为反垄断法规制上架费首先要实现的目标。如何利用我国反垄断法规制上架费,应对该法第三章"滥用市场支配地位"做合理解读。 The charging of slotting allowance by supermarkets is the result of abuses of buying power enjoyed by supermarkets in product distribution process. The regulation of slotting allowance should be based on the analysis by the rule of reason. In case of economic analysis providing no clear guide lines, competition and consumer welfare should be the first two goals to be achieved. The regulation of slotting allowance with the application of Anti-monopoly Law should be relied on the reasonable interpretation of Chapter Three “the abuse of dominant market position. ”
作者 王长秋
出处 《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》 2008年第4期100-104,共5页 Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 上架费 优势地位滥用 反垄断法 slotting allowance abuses of market power anti-monopoly law
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1.进场费减免还没有结论家乐福进场费风波难平[OL].http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20030717/0429371867.,.
  • 2Mary W.Sullivan, Slotting Allowances and The Market For New Products, Journal of Law And Economic. 40.(2).
  • 3钟谷兰.上架费之赛局理论分析[J].台大管理论丛,1995,6(2).
  • 4.家乐福发邀请函意在各个击破众协会声援怒炒[N].京华时报,2003-07-02.
  • 5.超市收费怎样看待?[OL].http://www.qinglian.com/news4/GBNEWS20010916OUT4.html,2004-4-23.
  • 6Bloom, Paul N.,Gregory T, Gundlach and Joseph P. Cannon, Slotting Allowances and Fees: School of Thought and The View of Practicing Managers ,Journal of Marketing ,64, 92-108.
  • 7章冠萍.[D].彰化师范大学,.
  • 8何之迈.控制企业经济力滥用之研究[J].法学丛刊,:130-130.
  • 9.2002年十大产业[OL].www.emkt.com.cn,2002-12-19.
  • 10黄铭杰.相对优势地位滥用与公平交易法之规范[J].台大法学论丛,(5).

共引文献12

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部