期刊文献+

IOL-Master的临床应用观察 被引量:7

Comparison of IOL-Master and conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较Zeiss IOL-Master与传统超声生物测量在人工晶状体测量中的准确性,并探讨不同测量方法的临床应用特点。方法:分析2007-11/2008-01在我院行白内障摘除及人工晶状体植入术的患者91例147眼,根据眼轴长度(L)分别分为五组(L≤22mm,22mm<L≤24.5mm,24.5mm<L≤26mm,26mm<L≤28mm,L>28mm),术前分别用ZeissIOL-Master,超声生物测量仪及角膜曲率计测量眼轴长度,角膜曲率和计算人工晶状体度数,并将结果进行比较。结果:用ZeissIOL-Master和超声生物测量仪测得的眼轴长度:L≤22mm组分别为21.69±0.298mm和21.97±0.623mm(P>0.05);22mm<L≤24.5mm组分别为23.15±0.567mm和23.50±1.396mm(P>0.05);24.5mm<L≤26mm组分别为25.16±0.425mm和25.20±0.485mm(P>0.05);26mm<L≤28mm组分别26.88±0.637mm和26.95±0.668mm(P>0.05);L>28mm组分别为31.59±1.852mm和31.22±1.718mm(P>0.05)。两种方法测得的眼轴长度在各组间无显著差异性。用IOL-Master和超声生物测量仪测得的各组的人工晶状体度数:L≤22mm组分别为23.73±1.29D和22.94±1.44D(P>0.05);22mm<L≤24.5mm组分别为20.52±1.47D和20.44±1.51D(P>0.05);24.5mm<L≤26mm组分别14.95±2.81D和15.23±3.00D(P>0.05);L>28mm组分别为-4.28±4.52D和-3.53±4.76D(P>0.05),显示各组间无显著性差异。IOLMaster和角膜曲率计检测到的角膜曲率分别为43.65±1.62和43.70±1.71,两者比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:IOL-Master用于人工晶状体度数的测量具有非接触、精确性高、操作简单、安全可靠和患者容易接受的特点。而传统的超声生物测量要接触患者角膜,对操作者的手法及患者的配合程度要求较高,但在屈光间质混浊明显的患眼测量中则明显较IOL-Master更为准确,因此临床上应根据个体情况选择不同的测量方法及计算公式以获得准确地人工晶状体度数。 AIM: To compared the power calculation of artificial intraocular lens by IOL-Master with that of conventional ultrasound biometry, and to evaluate the characteristic of these two different methods. METHODS: Ninety-one cases ( 147 eyes ) who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery were observed retrospectively. They were divided into five groups by ocular axial length ( L ≤ 22mm, 22mm 〈 L ≤24.5mm, 24.5mm 〈 L≤26mm, 26mm 〈 L ≤28mm, L 〉 28mm). IOL power was measured by either partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL-Master) or the ultrasound biometry, respectively. The IOL formular used for calculating the IOL power was SRK-Ⅱ or SRK/T. The keratometric power was examined by auto-keratmetry and IOL-Master. RESULTS. The ocular axial length of five each group presented no significant difference between IOL-Master and conventional ultrasound biometry ( L≤22:21.69 ± 0.298mm vs21.97 ± 0. 623mm; 22 〈 L≤24.5. 23.15 ± 0.567mm vs23.50 ±1. 396mm; 24, 5 〈 L≤26 : 25.16 ± 0.425mm vs25.20±0.485mm; 26〈L≤28:26.88± 0.637mm vs26.95 ± 0.668mm; L 〉 28mm. 31.59 ± 1. 852mm vs 31.22± 1. 718mm. all P〉 0.05). The mean intraocular lens power in the IOL-Master group was 18.43 ± 6.59D as compared to 18.33 ± 1.40D in the ultrasound group (P〉 0.05). The karetometric power in the IOL-Master group was 43.65 ± 1. 623 as compared to 43. 70 ± 1. 710 in the ultrasound group ( P〉 0.05). CONCLUSION; The non contact IOL-Master using the partial coherence laser interferometry principle provides an accurate, easy-to-do, safe and reliable tool in the measurement of ocular axial length and calculation of the IOL power.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2008年第6期1181-1183,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 IOL—Master 人工晶状体 超声生物测量 IOL-Master ultrasound biometry,intrao-cular lens
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of the theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993 ; 19:700-711
  • 2Binkhorst RD. The accuracy of ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye. Ophthalmic Surg 1981 ; 12:363-365
  • 3Holladay JT, Prager TC. Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculations. Arch Ophthalmol 1986 ; 104:539-541
  • 4Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace RS. Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry.J Cntaract Refract Surg 2001 ;27:861-867
  • 5刘平,石广森.IOL-MASTER测量人工晶体屈光度的精确性研究[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2006,24(8):786-788. 被引量:18
  • 6Rajan MS, Keilhom I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry VS conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.Eye 2002 ;16(5) :552-556
  • 7黄惠春,张少斌,周元升,郑煜.Zeiss IOL Master测量人工晶体度数的临床评价[J].医学临床研究,2004,21(4):354-356. 被引量:11
  • 8闰东君 李明花 李勤.SRK-Ⅱ公式预测人工晶状体屈光度数准确性分析[J].Chin J Lab Dingn,2006,(10):282-283.
  • 9Drexler RCO. Partial coherence interferemetry : a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery.Am J Ophthalmol 1998 ;126:524-434
  • 10Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using Zeiss IOL Master: a prospective study. Bull Soc Beleg Ophthalmol 2001 ;281 ( 1 ) :61-65

二级参考文献35

  • 1孙时英,马效工,王莺歌,李宗美,苏玉民.人工晶状体植入术后感染性眼内炎5例[J].眼科新进展,2004,24(4):246-246. 被引量:3
  • 2余洪华,邓金印.“复明2号”1089例白内障复明手术的临床分析[J].国际眼科杂志,2005,5(6):1248-1251. 被引量:9
  • 3易全勇,吕帆.有晶状体眼虹膜夹前房型人工晶状体植入矫治高度近视[J].国际眼科杂志,2006,6(5):1097-1100. 被引量:3
  • 4龚莉华,吴强.有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术矫正高度近视眼的进展[J].国际眼科杂志,2007,7(2):460-463. 被引量:20
  • 5Higis W, Lege B,Miller N,et al. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis[J].Graefe's Arch Chin Exp Ophthalmol,2000,238:765-773.
  • 6Packer M,Fine IH,Hoffman RS,et al. Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry outcomes analysis[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2002,28:239-242.
  • 7Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations[J].Eye,2002,16(5): 552-556.
  • 8Meyer F,Renard JP, Roux L,et al. Value of a new non-contact biometer for intraocular crystalline lens power calculation[J].J Fr Ophtalmol,2001,24(10): 1060-1066.
  • 9Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL Master:a prospective study[J].Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol,2001, 281(1): 61-65.
  • 10Ingrid Kielhorn, Madhavan S, Peter M,et al. Clinical assessment of the Zeiss IOL Master[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2003,29:518-522 .

共引文献110

同被引文献49

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部