期刊文献+

改进层次分析法和模糊综合评判实现压铸镁合金选材 被引量:2

Improved Analysis Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Synthetic Judgment on the Selection of Die Casting Magnesium Alloys
下载PDF
导出
摘要 材料选择过程中涉及因素多,必须对材料从整体上进行综合评价,建立正确的评判模型,从而客观合理确定优选材料。本文将模糊综合评价作为镁合金材料优选的主要方法,建立了压铸镁合金材料选择的评价模型,通过改进层次分析法确定了指标权重(隶属度);划定了评价指标等级,包括:很差、较差、一般、较好和很好五个等级;并将加权平均作为模糊综合评判运算模型。同时,以一手机外壳选材为例,具体说明该模型运行过程,评价结果较好的符合实际情况。 There are many factors in the selection of material, therefore, it is necessary to synthetically evaluate material all-sided and set up the evaluation model in order to select ,the most suitable material. Fuzzy Synthetic Judgment (FSJ) is adopted as the main evaluation method and the evaluation system of material selection is established in this investigation. Weighting is based on Improved Analysis Hierarchy Process(IAHP). Evaluation index grade is classified into five grades: very poor, poor, common, good and excellent. In this investigation, the method of weighted average was used as an arithmetical model of FSJ. Finally, material selection of a mobile telephone cover was taken as an example to illustrate the system, and the evaluation result is in good accordance with the practical situation.
出处 《铸造技术》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第6期735-738,共4页 Foundry Technology
关键词 改进层次分析法 模糊综合评价 加权平均 镁合金 选材 Lmproved Analysis Hierarchy Process (IAHP) Fuzzy Synthetic Judgment (FSJ) Weighted average Magnesium alloy Material selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献24

共引文献133

同被引文献11

  • 1赵德孜,温卫东,段成美.基于模糊数的航空发动机可靠性预计模型[J].航空动力学报,2004,19(3):320-325. 被引量:23
  • 2赵德孜,ZHAO,De-zi.燃气轮机可靠度的模糊预计与优化分配[J].燃气轮机技术,2005,18(1):47-51. 被引量:3
  • 3ORMON S W, CASSADY C R, GREENWOOD A G. Reliability prediction models to support conceptual design [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2002, 51 (2): 151- 157.
  • 4TYOKIN O I, SONKINA T. Parametric reliability- prediction based on small samples[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1997, 46(3): 394-399.
  • 5ZHAO De-zi, WEN Wei-dong, DUAN Cheng-mei. Application of mechanical reliability predication based on fuzzy theory[J]. Trans of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2004, 21(1): 76-80.
  • 6DENSON W. The history of reliability prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1998, 47(3): 321-328.
  • 7NACHTMANN H, CHIMKA J R. Fuzzy reliability in conceptual design[C]//2003 Proccexiings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2003.
  • 8BAZU M. A combined fuzzy-logic & physics-of-failure approach to reliability prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1995, 44(2): 237-242.
  • 9云绍辉.基于AHP的组织学习能力模糊综合评价[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2007,9(5):26-28. 被引量:4
  • 10王远达,宋笔锋.系统可靠性预计方法综述[J].飞机设计,2008,28(1):37-42. 被引量:26

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部