期刊文献+

企业R&D投资期权博弈方法的一般分析框架研究 被引量:3

General Framework Research on Options and Game Theory on Company R&D Investments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业R&D项目的3个特征——不可逆性、不确定性和竞争性,决定了其投资决策应该采用实物期权与博弈论相结合的决策评价方法,以提高投资决策的科学性和准确性。从传统理论方法存在的问题入手,对期权博弈方法在企业R&D项目决策中应用的优越性和必要性进行了阐述,并围绕其3个显著特征,归纳、总结了期权博弈方法应用的一般分析框架。在此基础上,对该方法的模型发展进行了比较和阐述。 The three features of company R&D projects -irreversible, uncertain and competitive,result in that the R&D investment decisions should adopt the framework based on real option and game theory, which can improve the scientism and accuracy of the decisions. This paper studies on the advantage and necessity of the use of this approach in the fields of company R&D project investment from the analysis of traditional methods problems, and summarizes the general applying framework based on these three features, and further compares and analyzes the model development.
作者 代军
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期52-55,共4页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2006Y102)
关键词 R&D 投资期权 期权博弈 R&D Option and Game Theory Framework Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Rune Stenbacka, Mihkel M. Tombak. Technology Policy and the Organization of R&D.[J]. Economic Behavior & Organization, 1998(36) :503-520.
  • 2Gotz G. Strategic Timing of Adoption of New Technology Under Uncertainty: A Note [j]. Review of Economic Studies, 2002,69(3): 729-747.
  • 3Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment under Uncertainty [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
  • 4Grenadier S R, Weiss A M. Investment in Technological Innovations: An Option Pricing Approach [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997,44 ( 3 ) :397-416.
  • 5Weeds H. Strategic Delay in a Real Options Model of R&D Competition [J ]. Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69 (3): 729-747.
  • 6Lambrecht B, Perraudin W. Real Options and Preemption Under Incomplete Information [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2003,27(4):619-643.
  • 7Thijssen J J J, van Damme E E C, Huisman K J M, Kort P M. Investment Under Vanishing Uncertainty Due to Information Arriving Over Time [R]. Working Paper,2001.
  • 8Decamps, Mariotti. Irreversible Investment and Learning Externalities [R].Working Paper, Universite de Toulouse I,http:Decamps, Mariotti. Irreversible Investment and Learning Externalities [R].Working Paper, Universite de Toulouse I,http: //www.idei.asso.fr/Commun/Articles/Decamps/Ext.pdf, 2000.
  • 9Kristian R. Miltersen. R&D Investments with Competitive Interactions [J] Review of Finance. 2004(8):355-401.
  • 10夏晖,曾勇,唐小我.技术创新战略投资的实物期权方法综述[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(1):88-96. 被引量:65

二级参考文献103

  • 1张维,安瑛晖.项目投资的期权分析方法[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2001,1(3):5-9. 被引量:15
  • 2[法]吉恩·泰勒尔.产业组织理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997..
  • 3Doraszelski U. Innovations, Improvements, and the Optimal Adoption of New Technologies[ R]. Working Paper, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, http://pubweb. acns. nwu. edu/- udo390/techadop. pdf, 2002.
  • 4Bessen J. Real Options and the Adoption of New Technologies[ R]. Working Paper, MIT, http://www. researchoninnovation. org/realopt. pdf, 1999.
  • 5Sarkar S. On the investment-uncertainty relationship in a real options model[ J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2000,24(2) : 219-225.
  • 6Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D[J]. Economics Journal, 1989, 99(397) : 569-596.
  • 7Grossman G, Shapiro J. Dynamic R&D competition[J]. Economic Journal, 1987, 97(386) : 372-387.
  • 8Hoppe H C. Second-mover advantages in the strategic adoption of new technology under uncetlainty[ J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2000, 18(2): 315-338.
  • 9Mason R, Weeds H. Networks, Options and Preemption[Rl. Working Paper, No. 575, University of Warwick, http://www.warwick. ac. uk/fac/soc/Economics/msearctVpapers/twerp575. pdf, 2000.
  • 10Huisman K J M, Kort P M. Strategic Technology Adoption Taking Into Future Technology Improvements: A Real Option Approach [R]. Working Paper, No. 2000-52, CentER, Tilburg University, http://greywww. kub. nl:2080/greyfiles/center/2000/doc/52. pdf, 2000.

共引文献64

同被引文献28

  • 1安实,田季员,赵泽斌.不确定及竞争条件下研发投资期权博弈分析[J].深圳大学学报(理工版),2009,26(1):102-105. 被引量:3
  • 2朱玉旭,黄洁纲,吴冲锋.序列投资决策的期权分析方法[J].决策与决策支持系统,1997(2):107-112. 被引量:20
  • 3安瑛晖,张维,熊熊,蒋东明.项目投资期权分析方法实证研究[J].系统工程,2005,23(7):94-99. 被引量:10
  • 4陈梅,茅宁.企业价值创造的期权博弈分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2005,25(9):65-70. 被引量:3
  • 5MYERS S C.Determinants of corporate borrowing[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 1977,5 ( 1 ): 411-487.
  • 6KESTER W C.Today's options for tomorrow's growth [J].Haryard Business Review, 1984,62: 153-160.
  • 7PERLITZ M,PESKE T,SCHRANK R.Real options valuation: the new frontier in R&D project evaluation [J].R & D Management, 1999,29(3): 255-269.
  • 8ROBERTS K,WEITZMAN M.Funding criteria for research, development,and exploration projects [J].Econometrical, 1981,49(5): 1261-1288.
  • 9REUER J J,TONG T W.Corporate investments and growth options [ J ].Managerial and Decision Economics, 2007,28 (8): 863 - 877.
  • 10SMIT H T J,TRIGEORGIS L.Strategic investment: real options and games [M].Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部