期刊文献+

不同年代出生人群的决策行为差异 被引量:1

Cohort Difference in the Ultimatum and Dictator Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借助经典博弈游戏——最后通谍博弈和独裁者博弈,考查不同年代出生人群的决策行为和价值取向差异。结果发现,老年组被试和青年组被试分配给博弈对方的份额有显著差异,老年组分配给对方更多,在作为回应者时,老年人的拒绝比例也显著低于年轻人;性别差异并不显著。在控制了学历因素后,笔者认为老年人比青年人更倾向于均等的分配方式,更多是由于其公平的价值取向,而非认知能力所致。 The study investigated the decision-making and value of people of different cohorts, by Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game. Results showed that older participants offered significantly more than the younger groups as proposers, and they rejected significantly less in UG as responders. As education of participants was controlled in the study, we argued that older people are more in favor of equal allocation and altruism than younger groups, due to their value of fairness instead of cognitive ability.
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第2期17-19,共3页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
关键词 决策 最后通谍博弈 独裁者博弈 decision-making Ultimatum Game Dictator Game
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Kahneman D.New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption[J].Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics,1994,150:18-36.
  • 2[2]Gigerenzer G,Goldstein D G.Reasoning the Fast and Frugal way:Models of Bounded Rationality[J].Psychological Review,1996,103:650-669.
  • 3皇甫刚,朱莉琪.Vernon Smith开创的实验经济学及其对心理学研究的启示[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(3):243-248. 被引量:6
  • 4朱莉琪,皇甫刚.不确定情境中的决策心理——适应与认知[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(5):481-485. 被引量:43
  • 5[5]G??uth W,Schmittberger R,Schwarz B.An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1982,(3):367-388.
  • 6[6]Forsythe R,Horowitz J L,Savin N E,et al.Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments[J].Games and Economics Behavior,1994,6(3):347-369.
  • 7汪丁丁.理性选择与道德判断——第三种文化的视角[J].社会学研究,2004(4):31-38. 被引量:23
  • 8[8]Henrich J.Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon[J].American Economic Review,2000,90(4):973-979.
  • 9[9]Martin A,Karen M,Karl S.Fairness Versus Reason in the Ultimatum Game[J].Science,2000,8(89):1773-1775.
  • 10[10]Solnick S J.Gender Difference in the Ultimatum Game[J].Economic Inquiry,2001,39:189-200.

二级参考文献31

  • 1朱莉琪,皇甫刚.生态智力——介绍一种新的智力观点[J].心理科学,2002,25(1):118-119. 被引量:4
  • 2Smith V. The Two Faces of Adam Smith, Distinguished Guest Lecture. Southern Economic Journal, 1998,65:1-19.
  • 3Smith V. Constuctivist and ecological rationality in economics, 2002.
  • 4Gigerenzer G. Adaptive Thinking, Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 5Gode D, Sunder S, Allocative efiSency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: market as a partial substitute for rationality, Journal of Political Economics,1993,101(1): 119-137.
  • 6Bergstrom T, Vernon Smith's insomnia and the dawn of economics as experimental science, 2002.
  • 7North D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 8Kagel J, Roth A, The handbook of experimental economics, Princeton University Press, 1995,.
  • 9Damasio A, DescaRe, s Error:, Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam, 1994.
  • 10Bechara, A, Damasio H, Trancl D and Damascio A, Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous Strategy.Science ,1997, 275:1293-1295.

共引文献69

同被引文献104

  • 1何贵兵.动态两难对策中信息反馈方式对合作行为的影响[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):876-880. 被引量:16
  • 2陈单枝,朱莉琪.儿童的决策行为[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(5):606-613. 被引量:14
  • 3刘长江,李岩梅,李纾.实验社会心理学中的社会困境[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):379-384. 被引量:35
  • 4周详,杨治良,郝雁丽.理性学习的局限:道德情绪理论对道德养成的启示[J].道德与文明,2007(3):57-60. 被引量:41
  • 5陈璨.(2008).儿童静态博弈决策的发展及心理规制研究.西南大学博士学位论文.
  • 6陈璩,姚彩云.(2010).维、汉个体博弈决策的跨文化比较研究.第十三届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集.
  • 7夸玉浩.(2012).博弈游戏中社会关系类型对公平偏好的影响.辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文.
  • 8Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2012). What you don' t know won' t hurt you: A laboratory analysis of betrayal aversion. Experimental Economies, 15(4), 571-588.
  • 9Alexopoulos, J., Pfabigan, D. M., Lamm, C., Bauer, H., & Fischmeister, F. P. S. (2012). Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three- person ultimatum game. Frongers in Human Neuroscience, 6, I-9.
  • 10Ambrus-Lakatos, L., & Meszerics, T. (2001). An experimentM atzMysis of the ultimatum game: The tole of compeng mogvations . Institute of Economics, Hun;arian Academy of Sciences.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部