期刊文献+

健康问题与疾病定量测试法逻辑判别系统对精神分裂症的再诊断 被引量:2

Valiadtion of the Rating Test for Health and Disease and its logical verdict system for patients with schizophrenia.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨健康问题与疾病定量测试法逻辑判别系统(RTHD-LVS)对偏执型和未定型精神分裂症的再诊断及其效度。方法对临床符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第三版(CCMD-3)诊断为精神分裂症偏执型和未定型的患者106例运用RTHD进行半定式评估,然后将数据输入RTHD-LVS数据库,再运用RTHD-LVS科研版和临床版对这些病例进行再诊断。以临床诊断作为金标准,比较两种版本诊断与临床诊断的符合率、两种版本对精神分裂症亚型的诊断与临床诊断的一致性以及两种版本之间诊断的一致性。结果①RTHD-LVS科研版轴1诊断为精神分裂症的患者99例,与临床诊断符合率为94.3%。RTHD-LVS临床版轴1诊断为精神分裂症偏执型和未定型两种亚型的诊断符合率为94.3%。②RTHD-LVS两种版本之间对于精神分裂症偏执型和未定型两种亚型的诊断一致性均较好(Kappa值分别为0.83和0.92)。③两种版本对精神分裂症未定型及偏执型的诊断与临床诊断的一致性较差(Kappa值为0.29-0.61)。结论能够满足于临床需要,可应用于临床。 Objective To validat the Rating Test for Health and Disease and its logical verdict system (RTHD-LVS)as an diagnostic instrument for assessing the patients with schizophrenia. Methods A total of 106 patients who met CCMD-3 criteria of paranoid or undifferentiated schizophrenia were assessed by using RTHD,and then were redlagnosed by RTHD-LVS. The logical diagnoses of research version(RV) and clinical version(CV) were compared. Results The number of patients had the RV Axis 1 diagnosis of schizophrenia was 99(93.4%) ,and the number of patients had the CV Axis 1 diagnosis of schizophrenia was 100(94.3%). As to paranoid schizophrenia,KAPPA for the RV Axis 1 diagnosis and that of CV was 0.83. As to undifferentiated schizophrenia Kappa for RV and CV was 0. 92,Kappa for RV Axis 1 diagnosis or CV of Axis 1 diagnosis and that of clinical diagnosis were 0. 92-0. 61. Conclusion RTHD-LVS is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the patients with schizophrenia. The logical diagnoses of both versions are consistent with the clinical diagnoses
出处 《精神医学杂志》 2008年第3期169-171,共3页 Journal of Psychiatry
基金 中华医学基金会(CMB)资助 项目编号为"Small Grants Program #02-777"
关键词 精神分裂症 健康问题与疾病定量测试法 诊断效度 Schizophrenia RTHD-LVS VaIidality
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1世界卫生组织.ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.190-196.
  • 2[2]American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[M].The forth edition(DSM-IV).Washington DC:1994,273-295
  • 3[3]WHO.Schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCAN)[M].WHO Geneva,1992
  • 4[4]First MB,Spitzer RL,Gibbon M,et al.Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-Ⅳ Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition(SCID-I/P)(Version 2.0)[M].New York:Biometrics Research Department,New York State Psychiatic Institute,1998,67-100(中文版)
  • 5[5]中华医学会精神科学分会等.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第2版修订版(CCMD-2-R)[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1995,57-61
  • 6刘启珍,韩云芳,王龙会,林祥珍,刘慧敏,王慧芳,沈鲁平.精神障碍诊断量表对偏执型和未定型精神分裂症患者的评定[J].中华精神科杂志,2002,35(2):107-110. 被引量:2
  • 7肖春玲,陈彦方,韦君美,江永华,刘炳文.精神分裂症382例七轴诊断分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2000,8(2):79-82. 被引量:11
  • 8[9]中华神经精神科学会等.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001,75-78
  • 9肖春玲,陈彦方,韦君美,江永华.精神分裂症患者185例的ICD-10、CCMD-2-R与CCMD-2诊断比较[J].临床精神医学杂志,1996,6(3):170-171. 被引量:3

二级参考文献11

共引文献11

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部