期刊文献+

退出制的本质及集团成员的确定方法之分析 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 在集团诉讼中,与加入制相比,退出制是确定集团成员范围时必须将选择退出的意愿予以明示的程序义务,它将沉默的含义推定为同意成为集团成员,追求群体性纠纷的统一解决;与禁止退出制相比,退出制是集团成员享有的排除集团诉讼裁判约束力的程序权利,它突出了对集团成员个体利益的保护和对诉讼自主权的尊重;在对集团成员的聚集能力方面,退出制高于加入制、低于禁止退出制;在对个体利益的特殊保护方面,退出制高于禁止退出制、低于加入制。
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《政治与法律》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期128-133,共6页 Political Science and Law
基金 美国福特基金会研究项目<解决群体纠纷的理论与实践>[项目批准号:10551035]的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1OLRC Report,467,Rachael Mulheron, The Class Action in Common Law Legal Systems: A Comparative Perspective (2004), P29
  • 2Rachael Mulheron, The Class Action in Common Law Legal Systems: A Comparative Perspective (2004), P29
  • 3Moore, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Some Problems Raised by the Preliminary Draft, 25 GEO. L J. 551,570-76(1937).
  • 4James M. Fraser, Opt-in Class Actions Under the FLSA. EPA. and ADEA:What Does It Mean to be “Similarly Situated”? 38 Suffolk U. h Rev. 95(2004).
  • 5Thomas E. Willging, Laural L Hooper & Robert J. Niemic Federal Judicial Center, Empirical Study of Class Actions in Four Federal District Courts: Final Report to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, P8.118,P52.134.
  • 6Bruce I. Bertelsen, Mary S. Calfee, Gerald W. Connor, The Rule 23 (b) (3) Class Action: an Empirical Study, 62 Geo. L J. 1123 [1974] ,P1150.
  • 7Theodore Eisenberg; Geoffrey Miller:The Role of Opt-outs and Objectors In Class Action Litigation: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, 57 Vand L. Rev. 1529(2004).
  • 8Neil Williams,“Consumer Class Action in Canada-Some Proposals for Reform” (1975)13 QSGOODE Hall Law Journal 1,79. Vince Morabito, Class Actions: The right to opt out Under Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976(CTH), 19 Melbourne University Law review 615. (1994),P629.635-636.
  • 9John E Kennedy, Class Actions: The Right To Opt Out, 25 Ariz. L Rev. 17, 1983-1984, note81.
  • 10Black's Law Dictionary(Sth),P208-209.

同被引文献145

引证文献7

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部