摘要
现实中的合同往往是不完全的。用法律或者惯例规定的违约救济来替代合同中的或然条款可以弥补合同的不完全性。运用法和经济学的研究方法,从违约救济的角度探讨合同双方的风险分担问题,推导帕累托最优的风险分担条件,并对各种违约救济方式所导致的风险分担进行比较。
The contract is usually incomplete. Using remedy stipulated by law or practice to substitute the contingent terms of the contract can make up the incompleteness. The paper, employing the method of law and economics, was concerned with risk sharing of the parties of a contract from the perspective of remedy. It calculated the condition of Pareto-efficient risk sharing, and compared the risk sharing of different remedies.
出处
《大连海事大学学报(社会科学版)》
2008年第3期63-66,共4页
Journal of Dalian Maritime University(Social Science Edition)