期刊文献+

认知负荷和控制性注意对工作记忆广度任务成绩的影响 被引量:10

THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE LOAD AND CONTROLLED-ATTENTION ON WORKING MEMORY SPAN TASKS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过stroop干扰实验严格筛选被试,考察了控制性注意能力不同的被试在加工部分认知负荷不同的工作记忆广度任务中的成绩。结果表明:任务复杂性和加工速度对工作记忆广度任务成绩有重要影响,任务越复杂或加工速度越快,被试的工作记忆广度任务成绩越低;在复杂的和加工速度快的工作记忆广度任务中,控制性注意能力高的被试成绩要好于控制性注意能力低的被试,但在简单的和加工速度慢的任务中两者成绩没有显著差异。 In this article, we chose subjects strictly by experiment of stroop-interference and investigated the perfor- mance of high and low controlled-attention capacity subjects in working memory span tasks that cognitive loads of processing are different. The resuhs showed tasks complexity and processing speed have effects on performance of working memory span tasks, the more complex the task and faster the processing speed, the lower the performance. In more complex and faster tasks, the performance of high subjects were higher than the low, but these effects were not significant in more simple and slower tasks.
作者 刘丽 李晖
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2008年第2期112-116,共5页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
关键词 认知负荷 任务复杂性 加工速度 控制性注意 工作记忆广度 cognitive load, tasks complexity, processing speed, controlled-attention, working memory span
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[1]Towse J N,Hitch G J,Hutton U.On the interpretation of working memory spans in adults.Memory and Cognition,2000,28(3):341-348
  • 2[2]Rohrer D,Pashler H.Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,2003,10(1):96~103
  • 3李力红,刘丽,车文博.工作记忆广度个体差异模型述评[J].心理科学,2005,28(6):1421-1423. 被引量:10
  • 4[4]Miyake A,Friedman N P,Emerson M J.The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex frontal lobe task:A latent variable analysis.Cognitive Psychology,2000,41(1):49~100
  • 5[5]Barrouillet P,Carnes V.Developmental of increase in working memory span:Resource sharing or temporal decay?Journal of Memory and Language,2001,45(1):1~20
  • 6[6]Towse J N,Hitch G J,Hutton U.On the nature of the ralationship between processing activity and item retention in children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,2002,82(2):156~184
  • 7[7]Danelles M,Scott J.Working memory capacity and strategy use.Memory and Cognition,2001,29(1):10~17
  • 8[8]Brian M E.Working memory and focal attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2001,27(3):817~835
  • 9[9]Logan G D.Working memory,task switching,and executive control in the task span procedure.Journal of Experimental Psycholngy:General,2004,133(2):218~236
  • 10[10]Baddeley A D,Logie R H.The multiple-component model.In:Miyahe A,Shah P(Eds).Models of working memory:Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control.New York:Cambridge University Press,1999

二级参考文献14

  • 1Garavan, H. Serial attention within working memory. Memory and Cognition, 1998,26:263 - 276.
  • 2Case,R. ,Kurland,M., and Goldberg, J. Operational efficiency and the growth of short- term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1982: 33:386 - 404.
  • 3Conway, A.R.A., and Engle, R. W. Working memory and retrieval: a resource- dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1994, 123:354 - 373.
  • 4Gordon D. Logan. Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General. 2004,133:218 - 236.
  • 5Engle, R. W. ,Kane, M.J., and Thholski, S.W. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention.general fluid intelligence, and functions of the frontal cortex. In: A.Miyake and P.Shah(Eds. ). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999:102- 134.
  • 6Badddey,A.D. ,and Logie, R. H. The multiple- component model. In:A, Miyake and P. Shah(Eds). Modds of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive vontrol. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999 ;28 - 61.
  • 7Badddey, A.D. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2000,4(11) :12.
  • 8Daneman , M., and Carwmter, P. A. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavipr,1980,19:450 - 466.
  • 9Towse, J. N., Hitch, G.. J. , and Hutton, U. On the nature of the ralationship between processing activity and item retention in children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2002,82:156- 184.
  • 10Pierre Barrouillet, Sophie Bernardin and Valerie Camos. Time Constraints and Resource Sharing in Adult's Working Memory Spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2004,133:83 - 100.

共引文献9

同被引文献117

引证文献10

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部