期刊文献+

粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌临床分离株的毒力因子与耐药性分析 被引量:9

Comparison of the Incidence of Virulence Determinants and Antibiotic Resistance between Clinical Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Strains
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检测临床分离肠球菌的耐药和毒力因子,比较粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌的耐药性和毒力特征。方法采用琼脂稀释法检测肠球菌对万古霉素(VAN)、四环素(TET)、环丙沙星(CIP)、红霉素(ERY)、复方新诺明(SMZ)、替考拉宁(TEC)、克林霉素(CLI)的耐药性;采用微量板测定肠球菌的生物膜形成能力;观察肠球菌的β溶血和明胶溶解结果,同时用PCR方法检测相应基因cylA和gelE。结果粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌的耐药率分别为0%~100%和3.23%~96.77%,后者对环丙氟哌酸、红霉素的耐药程度高于前者。β溶血试验阳性率为19.23%,cylA基因阳性率为35.38%;明胶表型阳性率为21.54%,gelE阳性率为40.0%,其中有46.15%(12/26)阳性者未出现相应表型;生物膜形成检出率为36.92%;粪肠球菌3种毒力因子(表型和基因型)的阳性率均高于屎肠球菌。结论屎肠球菌耐药率高于粪肠球菌,粪肠球菌毒力因子阳性率高于屎肠球菌。 Objective The aim of this investigation was to compare the incidence of virulence determinants and antibiotic resistance between Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium strains isolated from patients. Methods Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution susceptibility tests to determine the Minimum Inhibition Concentration (MIC). The phenotypic assay of gelatinase activity and β-hemolysis were performed on agar plate supplemented with 3% gelatin and 5% rabbit blood, respectively. Virulence determinants were detected by PCR. The biofilm assay was performed by using microtiter plate. Results The antibiotic resistant percentage of E. faecalis and E. faecium strains were 0%- 100% and 3.23%-96.77%, respectively. The prevalence of the virulence factors of genotype and phenotype were : β-hemolysin 19.23% vs. 35.38%, gelatinase 21.54% vs. 40.0%, biofilm formation 36.92%, respectively. Phenotypic testing revealed the existence of apparently silent gelE and cylA genes. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that E. faecalis have more virulence determinants and E. faecium have a higher antibiotic resistant percentage.
出处 《热带医学杂志》 CAS 2008年第5期433-435,共3页 Journal of Tropical Medicine
关键词 肠球菌 β溶血 明胶酶 耐药 基因 生物膜 enterococcus β-hemolysis gelatinase drug resistance gene biofilm
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献30

  • 1罗燕萍,白立彦,李俊玲,许淑秀.211株肠球菌属细菌对18种抗生素的耐药性特征[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2004,14(1):80-82. 被引量:68
  • 2马立艳,许淑珍,马纪平.肠球菌部分致病基因和表型的检测[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(5):529-532. 被引量:23
  • 3Mahmood Haghighat,Seyed Mohsen Dehghani,Abdolvahab Alborzi,Mohammad Hadi Imanieh,Bahman Pourabbas,Mehdi Kalani.Organisms causing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in children with liver disease and ascites in Southern Iran[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(36):5890-5892. 被引量:4
  • 4[1]Balas D,Alos JL,Crvajal R,et al. Enterococci isolated from blood (1989~ 1993):evolution of antibiotic susceptibility[J]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin,1995;13(8):455- 459.
  • 5[4]Emori TG,Gaynes RP .An overview of nosocomial infections including the role of the microbiology laboratory [J]. Clin Microbiol Rev,1993;6(4):428- 442.
  • 6[4]National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing[S]. Twelfth informantional supplement. 2002. 21(1): M100-s12.
  • 7[5]Udo EE, Al Sweih N, John P, et al. Antibiotic resistance of enterococci isolated at a teaching hospital in Kuwait[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2002, 43(3): 233-238.
  • 8[7]Livermore DM, Winstanley TG, Shannon KP. Interpretative reading: recognizing the unusual and inferring resistance mechanisms from resistance phenotypes[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2001, 48, Suppl 1: 87-102.
  • 9[8]Chow JW. Aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2000, 31: 586-589.
  • 10NCCLS. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing;Fourteenth InformationalSupplement [S].2004,24 (1):110~113.

共引文献106

同被引文献110

引证文献9

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部