期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

APACHEⅡ和SOFA评分对结肠穿孔手术风险的评估 被引量：2

Evaluation of surgical risks in patients with colonic perforation by APACHEⅡ and SOFA score systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价联合应用APACHEⅡ和SOFA评分系统对结肠穿孔手术风险的预警作用。方法:回顾分析61例结肠穿孔病例,并比较其临床结果与评分系统的关系。结果:①本组一期手术病例平均APACHEⅡ评分(14.4±1.7)、平均SOFA评分(7.8±1.2)分别低于二期手术病例(19.5±2.6和9.3±1.9)(P<0.05);②APACHEⅡ评分≥18病例的死亡率(87.5%)显著高于评分<18者(29.7%)(P<0.01),尤其是>21病例的死亡率高达90.9%(20/22);③SOFA评分≥9病例的死亡率(80.0%)显著高于评分<9者(27.8%)(P<0.01),且19例SOFA评分≥11者全部死亡;④APACHEⅡ评分≥18且SOFA评分≥9病例的死亡率(94.7%)显著高于APACHEⅡ评分<18且SOFA评分<9者(68.6%)(P<0.01),APACHEⅡ评分>19且SOFA评分>11的病例全部死亡(17/17)。结论:APACHEⅡ和SOFA评分可较准确地评估结肠穿孔病人的手术风险和预后。 Objective To evaluate the early prediction of operative risk in patients with colonic perforation by combined acute physiology and chronic health evaluation（APACHE Ⅱ ） score and by sepsis related organ failure assessment （SOFA） score. Methods Surgical risks in sixty-one patients with colonic perforation undergoing surgical treatment were analyzed retrospectively, and the relationship between the clinical results and the prediction by APACHE Ⅱand SOFA score systems was studied. Results In this study, （1）the median APACHE Ⅱ score（14.4±1.7） and median SOFA score （7.8±1.2） in stage Ⅰ operation patients were significantly lower than those （19.5±2.6 and 9.3±1.9） in stage Ⅱ operation patients （P〈0.05）; （2）the mortality （87.5%） in colonic perforation patients with APACHE Ⅱ score≥ 18 was significantly higher than that（29.7%） in those with APACHE Ⅱ score〈18（P〈0.01）; the mortality in patients with APACHE Ⅱ score〉21 was as high as 90.9%（20/22）; （3）the mortality（80.0%） in colonic perforation patients with SOFA score≥9 was significantly higher than that （27.8%） in those with SOFA score〈9 （P〈0.01）, and all 19 patients with SOFA score〉11 died; （4） the mortality（94.7%） in patients with APACHE Ⅱ≥ 18 and SOFA≥9 concomitantly, was significantly higher than that（68.6%） in patients with APACHE Ⅱ 〈18 and SOFA〈9 concomitantly （P〈0.01）. Furthermore, all 17 patients with APACHE Ⅱ 〉19 and SOFA〉11 concomitantly （P〈0.01） died. Conclusions The APACHE Ⅱand SOFA score systems help effectively to evaluate the surgical risk and prognosis in patients with colonic perforation.
作者 张维建 韩少良 蒋飞照 俞志勇 方瑶
机构地区 温州医学院附属第一医院普外科 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院外科
出处 《外科理论与实践》 2008年第3期197-200,共4页 Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice
关键词 APACHEⅡ评分 SOFA评分 结肠穿孔 死亡率 外科手术 APACH Ⅱ score SOFA score Colonic perforation Mortality Surgical risk
分类号 R656.9 [医药卫生—外科学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Armbruster C, Kriwanek S, Roka R. Spontaneous perforation of the large intestine. Resection with primary anastomosis or staged (Hartmann) procedure?[J]. Chirurg, 2001,72(8):910-913.
  • 2Bielecki K, Kaminski P, Klukowski M. Large bowel perforation: morbidity and mortality [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2002,6(3): 177-182.
  • 3Biondo S, Pares D, Marti Rague J, et al. Emergency operations for nondiverticular perforation of the left colon [J]. Am J Surg,2002,183(3):256-260.
  • 4Alvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG, et al. Presentation, treatment, and multivariate analysis of risk factors for obstructive and perforative colorectal carcinoma [J]. Am J Surg,2005,190(3):376-382.
  • 5Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation:a physiologically based classification system[J]. Crit Care Med, 1981,9(8):591-597.
  • 6Ochiai T, Hiranuma S, Takiguchi N, et al. SOFA score predicts postoperative outcome of patients with colorectal perforation[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2004,51 (58): 1007- 1010.
  • 7Oda S, Hirasawa H, Sugai T, et al. Comparison of Sepsisrelated Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and CIS (cellular injury score) for scoring of severity for patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)[J]. Intensive Care Med,2000,26(12):1786-1793.
  • 8Komatsu S, Shimomatsuya T, Nakajima M, et al. Severity scoring systems for prognosis and efficacy of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber treatment for colonic perforation [J]. Surg Today, 2006,36(9):807-810.
  • 9Komatsu S, Shimomatsuya T, Nakajima M, et al. Prognostic factors and scoring system for survival in colonic perforation[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2005,52(63):761-764.
  • 10Setti Carraro PG, Magenta A, Segala M, et al. Predictive value of a pathophysiological score in the surgical treatment of perforated diverticular disease[J]. Chir Ital,1999, 51(1):31-36.

同被引文献19

  • 1庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:1086.
  • 2Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures[J]. Anesthesiology, 1941,2(3):281-284.
  • 3American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status [J]. Anesthesiology, 1963,24(1): 111.
  • 4Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H.ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome[J]. BrJ Anesth, 1996, 77(2):217-222.
  • 5Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE : a severity of disease classification system[J]. Crit Care Med,1985, 13(10):818-829.
  • 6Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit[J]. BrJ Surg, 1991, 78(3): 356-360.
  • 7Whiteley MS,Prytherch DR,Higgins B, et al. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system [J]. Br J Surly, 1996,83 (6):812-815.
  • 8Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM. Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM) [J]. BrJ Surg, 2004, 91(9):1174-1182.
  • 9Hartley MN, Sagar PM. The surgeon's 'gut feeling' as a predictor of post-operative outcome[J]. Ann RCoilSurg Engl, 1994, 76(6 Suppl): 277-278.
  • 10张志强,蔡兵,吴鸣宇.POSSUM和P—POSSUM评分系统对肝部分切除手术风险度的评估[J].中国现代医学杂志,2010,12(12):45—47.

引证文献2

二级引证文献56

外科理论与实践
2008年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部