期刊文献+

括约肌保存术治疗单纯性高位肛瘘的研究 被引量:4

Treatment for high simple anal fistula with sphincter-preserving fistulectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨应用括约肌保存术治疗单纯性高位肛瘘的效果。方法:对2000年9月至2006年7月收治的112例单纯性高位肛瘘病人,随机分别行括约肌保存肛瘘切除术与挂线疗法。评估和比较术后复发与括约肌功能受损程度。肛门控便功能采用肛门失禁严重度指数(FISI)评价。结果:括约肌保存术组术后平均愈合时间显著短于挂线疗法组(P<0.01),其术后复发率(1.69%)显著性低于挂线疗法组(13.21%)(P<0.05)。括约肌保存术组术后1年时的平均FISI值为6.3,挂线疗法组为13.1,存在显著性差异(P<0.01)。括约肌保存术组无FISI>30的病人,而挂线疗法组FISI>30者占7.55%,二者有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:肛瘘切除术保存括约肌较挂线疗法疗程短、复发率低、对控便功能损伤小,是高位单纯性肛瘘治疗的可行选择。 Objective To study the effect of sphincter-preserving fistulectomy in the treatment of high simple anal fistula. Methods A total of 112 cases of high simple anal fistula were studied, of which 59 cases were treated by sphincter-preserving fistulectomy (Groupl), 53 cases by cutting seton technique (Group2). Results The healing time of Groupl was (12±2) d, significantly shorter than that of Group2 [(20±3) d](P〈0.01). Groupl had a recurrence rate of 1.69%, significantly lower than that of Group2(13.21%)(P〈0.05). The mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Index(FISI) of the 2 groups were 6.3 and 13.1 respectively, with a significant statistical difference(P〈0.01). There was no case with FISI〉30 in Groupl (0%), while 4 cases(7.55%) had FISI〉30 in Group2(P〈0.05). Conclusions In the treatment of high simple anal fistula, sphincter-preserving fistulectomy offers rapid healing, low recurrence and good functional outcome for fecal control; it could be accepted as a preferrable method for the disease entity.
出处 《外科理论与实践》 2008年第3期216-219,共4页 Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice
关键词 肛瘘 括约肌保存 肛瘘切除术 挂线疗法 Fistula-in ano Sphincter preserving Fistulectomy Cutting seton
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Zimmerman DD, Briel JW, Gosselink MP, et al. Anocutaneous advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2001,44(10):1474-1480.
  • 2Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O, et al. Endorectal ad- vancement flap: are there predictors of failure?[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45(12):1616-1621.
  • 3高野正博.痔瘺括約筋存術式の遠隔成績.日本大腸肛門病会志,1990,43(4):561-571.
  • 4Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,1999,42(12):1525- 1532.
  • 5Cavanaugh M, Hyman N, Osler T. Fecal incontinence severity index after fistulotomy: a predictor of quality of life[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45(3):349-353.
  • 6符中柱,李可,姚嵋芳.高位单纯性肛瘘切除缝合术与切开挂线术的对比[J].贵阳医学院学报,2004,29(3):259-260. 被引量:1
  • 7Willis S, Rau M, Schumpelick V. Surgical treatment of high anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas with the use of transanal endorectal advancement flaps[J]. Chirurg,2000, 71 (7):836-840.
  • 8Athanasiadis S, Helmes C, Yazigi R, et al. The direct closure of the internal fistula opening without advancement flap for transsphincteric fistulas-in-ano[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47(7): 1174-1180.
  • 9Koehler A, Risse-Schaaf A, Athanasiadis S. Treatment for horseshoe fistulas-in-ano with primary closure of the internal fistula opening: a clinical and manometric study[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47(11):1874-1882.
  • 10Gustafsson UM, Graf W. Excision of anal fistula with closure of the internal opening: functional and manometric results[J]. Dis Colon Reetum,2002,45(12):1672-1678.

二级参考文献1

  • 1Parks AG. Etiology and surgical treatment of fistula-in-ano[J].Dis Colon Rectum,1963,6(1),17-22.

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部