两种不同引产方式对中期妊娠引产效果的比较

Comparative Study of Two Methods of Drug Induced Abortion During Mid-pregnancy

目的比较依沙吖啶联合米非司酮、米非司酮联合米索前列醇应用于中期妊娠引产的临床效果。方法回顾分析采用两种引产方式中止妊娠的196例孕妇病例资料。结果两组产后出血量、清宫率无明显差异(P>0.05),引产时间和引产成功率有明显差异(P<0.05)。结论两种方法用于中期妊娠引产效果肯定,创伤及痛苦小,各有优缺点,可按照孕妇体质及接受程度选择使用。

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of ethacridine plus mifepristone and mifepristone plus misoprostol regimens induced abortion during mid pregnancy. Method The clinica.I data of 196 pregnant women which were performed drug induced abortion during their midpregnancies were retrospectively analyzed. Results The blood loss and the uterine apoxesis rate after abortion showed no significantly difference （P 〉 0.05）, however, the onset time and the success rate of induced abortion showed significant differences （P〈 0.05）. Conclusion Both methods of induced abortion show acceptable clinical outcomes with little damage. Each has its own advantages and shortcoming, we can choose according to clinical situation.