期刊文献+

基于Event的侧向碰撞风险改进模型 被引量:13

Improved Lateral Collision Risk Model Based on Event
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Event模型是一种基于长方体碰撞模板的碰撞风险评估模型,用该模型评估所得的碰撞风险概率过于保守。将碰撞模板改为圆柱体,建立了基于碰撞圆柱体的Event模型。在相同条件下运用Event模型和改进的Event模型对平行航路的侧向碰撞风险进行了评估计算,后者的碰撞风险是原Event模型碰撞风险的86.9%,仿真结果表明改进模型碰撞风险评估更精确,能够为中国平行航路的开辟进行安全评估计算提供理论依据。 The Event model used for evaluating collision risk is based on cuboid collision slab. Tbe probability of collision risk of parallel routes evaluated by this model is somewhat conservative. The collision slab is used of cylinder, A new Event model based on collision cylinder is estabilished. Under the same conditions, the lateral collision risk of parallel routes is evaluated by the Event model and the improved Event model respectively. The collision risk of the case evaluated by the improved model is 86.9%, compared to the result of the Event model. The simulation results indicate that the collision risk of the improved model is more precise. The improved model can laid the theoretical basis for the safety assessment of initionating parallel routes in China.
出处 《中国民航大学学报》 CAS 2008年第3期1-4,共4页 Journal of Civil Aviation University of China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60572165)
关键词 碰撞风险 平行航路 碰撞圆柱体 间隔片 collision risk parallel routes collision cylinder separation sheet
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]REICH P G.Analysis of long-Range air traffic systems:separation standards ⅠⅡⅢ[J].Journal of the Institute of Navigation,1966,19 (1):88-98; 1966,19 (2):169-186; 1966.19 (3):331-347.
  • 2[2]PETER BROOKER.Lateral collision risk in air traffic systems:a "Post-Reich" event model[J].Journal of Navigation,2003,56(3):399-409.
  • 3[3]HSU D A.The evaluation of aircraft collision probabilities at intersecting air routes[J].Journal of Navigation,1981,34(1):78-102.
  • 4[4]LLOYDDE.ApplicationofMonteCarloMethodstoEstimationofCollision Risks Associated with ATC Separation Standards[R].AD-773313,1973.
  • 5[5]NATSPG-North Atlantic Systems Planning Group.Summar of Discussions and Conclusions ofthe North Atlantic Systems Planning Group[R].NAT SPG/38,2002.
  • 6[6]GEERT MOEK,EDWARD LUTZ,WILLIAM MOSBERG.Risk Assessment of RNPIO and RVSM in the South Atlantic Flight Identification Reglons[R].ARINC,2001.

同被引文献79

  • 1卢飞,滕景杰,吴俊,张兆宁,张宗路.尾涡流场影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞动力学分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2020(4):21-27. 被引量:12
  • 2韩松臣,裴成功,隋东,左凌.平行区域导航航路安全性分析[J].航空学报,2006,27(6):1023-1027. 被引量:34
  • 3张兆宁,张晓燕.交叉航路碰撞风险研究[J].航空计算技术,2007,37(2):1-4. 被引量:17
  • 4CAMPOS L M B C, MARQUES J M G. On a combination of gamma and generalized error distributions with application to aircraft flight path deviations[J]. Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods, 2004, 33(10):2307-2332.
  • 5CAMPOS L M B C. Probability of collision of aircraft with dissimilar position errors[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 38(4) : 593-599.
  • 6Doc 9689-AN/953, manual on airspace planning methodology for the determination of separation minima[S].
  • 7REICH P G. Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: sepa- ration standards [J]. Journal of Navigation, 1966, 19(1) : 88-98.
  • 8REICH P G. Analysis of long range air traffic systems: sepa- ration standards Ⅱ[J]. Journal of Navigation, 1966, 19(2): 169-186.
  • 9REICH P G. Analysis of long-range air traffic systems., sepa- ration standardsⅢ[J]. Journal of Navigation, 1966, 19(3) : 332-347.
  • 10MOEK G, LUTZ E, MOSBER6 W. Risk assessment of RNP 10 and RVSM in the South Atlantic flight identification regions[R]. Annapolis: ARINC, 2001.

引证文献13

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部