期刊文献+

气态甲醛暴露对神经生长因子表达影响的体内实验 被引量:2

Nerve growth factor expression in mice and rats induced by gaseous formaldehyde exposure in vivo
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探讨气态甲醛对小鼠组织中NGF表达的诱导作用,以小鼠肺和脑作为实验材料,应用RT-PCR方法检测甲醛染毒后小鼠肺和脑中NGF-mRNA的表达量.结果显示,小鼠脑中NGF表达量随着染毒时间的增加而增加;而肺中NGF在甲醛染毒1d后就达到最大,但随着时间的增加NGF表达量反而下降;故NGF在小鼠这2种组织中呈现不同的表达效应.为了进一步研究甲醛、NGF和哮喘之间的联系,构建了大鼠的哮喘模型,应用RT-PCR方法检测哮喘模型鼠肺中NGF的表达趋势.结果显示,在大鼠哮喘模型中,低浓度甲醛组(1.0mg·m-3)NGF表达量显著上调(p<0.01),而高浓度甲醛组(3.0mg·m-3)NGF表达量反而下降,仅略高于空白对照组(p>0.05). Expression of Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) mRNA in lung and brain tissues of mice, as induced by gaseous formaldehyde was explored. RT-PCR was applied to assess NGF mRNA expression levels in the two tissues after formaldehyde inhalation in vivo. The results showed that NGF mRNA expression levels in mice brain increased with formaldehyde inhalation time. Compared with expression in the brain, there were higher expression levels of NGF mRNA in mice lung after 1 day, but the expression level dropped as the formaldehyde inhalation time increased. So there were different expression effects of NGF mRNA in the two tissues. A rat asthma model was built to investigate the relationships among formaldehyde, NGF and asthma. RT-PCR was used to assess NGF mRNA expression levels in rat lungs. In the rat asthma model, NGF mRNA expression levels of low formaldehyde-induced groups (1.0 mg·m^-3) were up-regulated significantly (p〈0.01), but the levels of high formaldehyde-induced groups (3.0 mg·m^-3) dropped little compared with the low formaldehyde induced groups, and were just higher than the control groups (p〉0.05).
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期1413-1418,共6页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(No2006BAI19B05) 国家自然基金面上项目(No30570799)~~
关键词 神经生长因子(NGF) 甲醛(formaldehyde) RT-PCR 哮喘模型(Asthma model) nerve growth factor formaldehyde RT-PCR asthma model
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1刘英帅,鲁志松,杨继文,吴连锋,杨旭.甲醛致人血淋巴细胞DNA-蛋白质交联作用的定量研究[J].湖北预防医学杂志,2004,15(4):4-7. 被引量:36
  • 2罗纪盛,顾亦军,张艳萍,佘蓝.GSH对甲醛的解毒作用[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),1995(1):101-107. 被引量:5
  • 3彭光银,刘英帅,段丽菊,杨旭.甲醛所致DNA断裂和DNA交联的作用[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2005,16(2):35-37. 被引量:17
  • 4Conaway CC, Whysner J, Verna LK, et al. Formaldehyde mechanistic data and risk assessment:endogenous protection from DNA adduct formation [J]. Pharmacol Ther. 1996, 71(1-2) : 29-55.
  • 5Zhitkovich. A, Costa. M, A simple, sensitive assay to detect DNA-protein crosslinks in intact cells and in vivo[J], Carcinogenesis, 1992,13(8), 1485-1489.
  • 6Kuykendall J, R, Trela B. A, Bogdanffy M. S,DNA-protein crosslink formation in rat nasal epithelial cells hyhexam-ethylphosphoramide and its correlation with formaldehyde production[J]. Mutation research, 1995,343:209-218.
  • 7Chakraharti S. K, Bai c. j, Subramanian K. S, DNA-protein crosslinks induced by nickel compounds inisolated rat renal cortical cells and its antagonism by specific amino acids and magnesium ion [J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology,1999, 154: 245-255.
  • 8Cook PR. Brazell IA. Conformationat constraints in nuclear DNA[J].J Cell Sci,1976,22:287.
  • 9Yingshuai Liu, Chang M Li, Zhisong Lu, Shumao Ding, Xu Yang, and Jianwei Mo. Studies on formation and repair of formaldehyde-damaged DNA by detection of DNA-protein crosslinks and DNA breaks[J]. Front Biosci. 2006 Jan 1,11:991-7.
  • 10Tice R R, Agurell E, Anderson D, et al. Single Cell Gel/Comet Assay.. Guidelines for In Vitro and In Vivo Genetic Toxicology Testing[J]. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2000, 35:206-221.

共引文献27

同被引文献12

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部