道路安全评价的基本原理被引量：1

The Fundamental Principles of Road Safety Audit

下载PDF

导出

摘要道路安全评价是促进道路设施安全改善的有效方法之一。其基本原理在于道路设施必须满足用户的安全使用需求。体现在具体的道路设施的规划、设计、运营和改善中,该基本原理要求道路设计能够:(1)满足用户期望;(2)满足视距要求;(3)减小速度差;(4)充分利用交通控制设施,管理冲突点;(5)考虑冲出路外事故,具备容错特征;(6)考虑开口管理、减少横向干扰;(7)考虑紧急运营状况及其风险管理。在具体工作中按照这七个方面去评价,将不仅有助于促进安全评价工作的全面、系统开展,同时也将有助于道路安全设计质量的提高。 Road safety audit has been widely recognized as an effective proactive safety improvement approach.The fundamental prin- ciple of road safety audit was that road facility must be safe for users to use.Embodied in road facility planning,design,operation and improvement,this fundamental principle requires that road facilities:1)Satisfy user expectations;2)Satisfy sight distance re- quirements;3)Minimize speed differentials;4)Minimize traffic conflicts using traffic control devices;5)Anticipate road departures and incorporate forgiving roadside design concept;6)Follow successful access management concepts;and 7)Incorporate risk man- agement strategies.These seven aspects may serve as the basis of road safety audit,which will not only help auditors to conduct more systematic and efficient reviews,but also help engineers to design safer facilities.

作者王忠仁

机构地区美国加州运输局

出处《上海公路》 2008年第2期1-6,共6页 Shanghai Highways

关键词道路安全安全审计基本原理 Road Safety Safety Audit Fundamental Principles

分类号 U491 [交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理] U412 [交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1[1]JTG/T B05-2004,公路项目安全性评价指南[S].
2[2]TAC 2001.The Candian Road Safety Audit Guide.Transportation Association of Canada,Owatta,Ontario,December 2001.
3[3]NHI (2005).National Highway Institute (NHI) Course No.380075.New approaches to highway safety analysis.Publication No.FHWA-NHI-05-XXX.US Department of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration,Washington,D.C.,2005.
4[4]Lundy,R.A.(1966).The effect of ramp type and geometry on accidents,2nd Ed.Traffic Deparement,Division of Highways,Department of Public Works,State of California,1966.
5[5]McLean,J.(1979).An alternative to the design speed concept for low speed alignment design.Transportation Research Record 702,Transportation Research Board,National Research Council,Washington,D.C.,1979,PP.55-63.
6[6]Migletz,D.J.,Glauz,W.D.,and Bauer,K.M.Relationships between traffic conflicts and accidents,Report No.FHWA/RD-84/042,Federal Highway Administration,US Department of Transportation,Washington,D.C.,July 1985.
7[7]Gluck,J.,Levinson,H.S.and Stover,V.(1999).Impacts of access management techniques.NCHRP Report 420,Transportation Research Board,National Research Council,Washingtong,D.C.,1999.
8[8]Parker,M.R.and Zegeer,C.V.Traffic conflict techniques for safety and operations--Observers Manual.Publication No.FHWA-IP-88-027,Washington D.C.,January 1989.
9[9]FHWA 2003.Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD),Federal Highway Administration,2003,available online at http://muted.fhwa.dot.gov/,accessed as of August 14,2006.
10[10]AASHTO (2002).AASHTO Road Side Design Guide,American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.