林地确权行政案件复议前置分析

Analysis on Prepositive Reconsideration of the Affirmation of Woodland Rights

从当前形势看,迫切需要区分林地确权行政案件中复议前置的情形。鉴于此,必须正确认识《中华人民共和国行政复议法》第30条第1款和法释[2003]5号批复的内容,其中颇具争议的"确认具体行政行为"应理解为行政确认和行政裁决,"已经依法取得"应理解为公民、法人或者其他组织主观上认为"已经依法取得"权属即可,"法律另有规定的除外"应理解为包括《中华人民共和国森林法》等法律的规定。因此,由行政机关依当事人申请直接确权的行为属于复议前置;因发生争议由行政机关处理而发生的确权行为,仍应按《森林法》第17条的规定,由当事人选择行政复议或者行政诉讼。

There is an urgent need to distinguish prepositive reconsideration in the affirmation of woodland rights at present. Therefore, we should correctly understand the content of the first item of article 30 of Administrative Reconsideration Law of the People＇ s Republic of China and the No. 5 Judicial Interpretation in 2003 by the Supreme Court. For instance, ＂ recognizing the specific administrative action＂ should be understood as administrative affirmation and adjudication; ＂has been made in accordance with the law＂ should be understood as citizens, corporations or other organizations subjectively consider that the ownership ＂has been made in accordance with the law＂; ＂except as otherwise provided in the law＂ should be understood as including Forest Law of the People＇ s Republic of China and other regulations. Upon these, the action of direct affirmation of woodland rights by administration after the request of concerned parties is prepositive reconsideration; the action of affirmation of woodland rights caused by dispute which needs administration to handle should be in term of the provisions of item 17 of Forest Law, let the involved parties choose administrative reconsideration or administrative proceedings.