期刊文献+

我国现行药品招标采购制度的经济学分析 被引量:8

Economic Analysis on Current Drug Bidding System in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:就完善我国药品招标采购制度提出对策建议。方法:从药品招标采购制度的推行目的入手,分析药品招标采购制度的执行效果,并利用经济学中信息不对称理论分析其执行效果不佳的原因,然后与美国的招标采购制度进行比较。结果与结论:建议我国的招标采购制度采用为支付方代理的模式,收费采用向委托方收费的模式。规范药品流通渠道,降低药品价格,减轻患者负担是一项系统工程,非单一药品招标采购制度所能解决。 OBJECTIVE: To put forward strategies to evolve the current drug bidding system. METHODS: The objective and efficacy of the drug bidding system was analyzed; and the reasons for the poor efficacy of the system were analyzed using the information asymmetry theory in economics, and the system was compared with its US counterpart. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: The drug bidding system in China should adopt such model in which the payers are chosen as agency and charge from the entrusting party. It is a systematic project to standardize drug circulation channels, reduce drug price and reduce the burden of patient, which can't be tackled by drug bidding system only.
作者 杨悦 蒋志刚
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第19期1449-1451,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 药品 招标采购制度 信息不对称 代理 Drug Bidding system Information asymmetry Agent
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1我国医药商业步入全面竞争时代[N].医药经济报,2005—6—28(8).
  • 2张秀云.美国药品市场走过艰难而兴奋的一年[J].医药经济信息,2005,8:26-26.
  • 3Goldman sachs. Industry report:Health care technology & distribution [ EB/OL ]. http ://gs. com/search/distribution, 2003-01- 13/2006-02-03.
  • 4Standard & Poor' s. GIGS Sub-Industry Revenue Share[ EB/OL ]. http ://www. Standardpoors. com/pharmindustry, pdf, 2004 - 09 - 04/2006 - 02 - 03.
  • 5Healthcare Distribution Management Association ( HDMA). 2005 - 2006 HDMA Faetbook[ M]. USA. HDMA, 2006.1 - 6.
  • 6赵铮.揭开美国药品流通的伤疤[N].医药经济报,2005—12—23(6)
  • 7Denavas-Walt C, Proctor B, Lee C. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2004[R]. Current Population Reports, U. S. Census Bureau,2005 : 11 - 12
  • 8NACDA. Industry facts at a glance [ EB/OL ]. http://www. nacds, org/pharmstaff, html, 2005 - 12 - 31/2006-02-03.
  • 9Goldman Sachs.Industry report:health care technology & distribution[EB/OL].http://gs.com/search/industry report:health care technology & distribution,2003,10,1.
  • 10Standard & Poor's.GIGS Sub-Industry Revenue Share[EB/OL].http://www.standardpoors.com.2004,9,4.

共引文献31

同被引文献94

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部