期刊文献+

甲磺酸罗哌卡因与盐酸罗哌卡因用于颈丛神经阻滞的临床观察 被引量:3

Clinical Observation of Ropivacaine Mesylate and Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Cervical Pexus Block
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较0.447%甲磺酸罗哌卡因与0.375%盐酸罗哌卡因用于颈丛神经阻滞的有效性和安全性。方法80例甲状腺手术患者随机分为两组,对照组应用0.375%盐酸罗哌卡因颈丛神经阻滞;试验组应用0.447%甲磺酸罗哌卡因颈丛神经阻滞。结果在感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间、效果及效果维持时间以及不良反应方面,0.447%甲磺酸罗哌卡因与0.375%盐酸罗哌卡因未见明显的差异。结论0.447%甲磺酸罗哌卡因与0.375%盐酸罗哌卡因应用于颈丛神经阻滞,具有相似的麻醉效果。 Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of ropivacaine mesylate cervical plexus block and ropivacaine hydrochloride cervical plexus block in thyroidectomy. Methods Eithty patients undergoing thyroidectomy were divided randomly into the control group treated by 0.375% ropivacaine hydrochloride cervical plexus block and experiment group treated by 0. 447% ropivacaine mesylate cervical plexus block. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups on the initiating or lasdng time of effectiveness and adverse reaction. Conclusion In thyroidectomy, ropivacaine hydrochloride cervical plexus block and ropivacaine mesylate cervical plexus block possess similar efficacy.
出处 《咸宁学院学报(医学版)》 2008年第2期116-117,共2页 Journal of Xianning Univarsity(medical Sciences)
关键词 甲磺酸罗哌卡因 盐酸罗哌卡因 颈丛神经阻滞 Ropivacaine mesylate Ropivacaine hydrochloride Cervical plexus block
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献21

  • 1徐建青,朱波,叶铁虎.硬膜外隙甲磺酸罗哌卡因的麻醉和术后镇痛临床效果[J].中国医学科学院学报,2004,26(6):700-703. 被引量:23
  • 2金涌,李俊,吕雄文,过林,葛金芳,徐叔云.甲磺酸罗哌卡因注射液的狗药代动力学研究[J].安徽医药,2005,9(1):10-12. 被引量:13
  • 3徐建青,朱波,叶铁虎,吴新民,秦翔,王庚,许幸,于布为,李一亮,周静芳,王玉萍.手术患者0.894%甲磺酸罗哌卡因与0.75%盐酸罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(8):624-625. 被引量:48
  • 4Nancarrow C,Rutten AJ, Runciman WB, et al. Myocardial and cerebral drug concentrations and the mechanisms of death after fatal intravenous doses of lidocaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine in the sheep. Anesth Analg,1989,69: 276-283.
  • 5Bader AM,Datta S, Flanagan H, et al. Comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine induced conduction in the blockade in the isolated rabbit vagus nerve. Anesth Analg, 1989, 68: 724-727.
  • 6Akerman B, Hellberg IB, Trosvik C. Primary evaluation of the local anaesthetic properties of the amino amide agent ropivacaine (LEA 103).Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1988, 32:571-575.
  • 7Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared to bupivacaine. Anesth Analg, 1989, 69:563-569.
  • 8Finucane BT, Sandler AN, McKenna J, et al. A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 0. 5%, 0. 75%, 1.0% and bupivacaine 0. 5%,injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Can J Anaesth, 1996, 43:442-449.
  • 9Wood MB, Rubin AP. A comparison of epidural 1% ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivacaine for lower abdominal gynecologic surgery. Anesth Analg, 1993, 76:1274-1278.
  • 10Brockway MS, Bannister J, McClure J, et al. Comparison of extradural ropivacaine and bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth, 1991, 66:31-37.

共引文献164

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部