期刊文献+

子宫内膜异位症、子宫肌瘤患者AHSG基因多态性的研究

Distribution of AHSG gene polymorphism in patients with endometriosis and patients with myoma of uterus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究α2-HS糖蛋白(AHSG)基因第七个外显子中Sac I位点多态性在子宫内膜异位症、子宫肌瘤患者及正常人中的分布。方法:应用聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性技术检测98名子宫内膜异位症患者与97名子宫肌瘤患者及99名健康成年女性的AHSG基因第七个外显子中Sac I位点多态性,比较三组AHSG基因型和等位基因的分布频率。结果:GG、GC和CC基因型在子宫内膜异位症患者中分别为32.65%、57.14%、10.20%,在子宫肌瘤患者中分别为75.26%、22.68%、2.06%,在健康成年女性中分别为74.75%、23.23%、2.02%。子宫内膜异位症组与子宫肌瘤组及健康成年女性组基因型的分布频率差异有显著性,而子宫肌瘤组与健康成年女性组无显著性差异。结论:AHSG基因第七个外显子中Sac I位点多态性分布与子宫内膜异位症的发病具有一定程度的相关性,而与子宫肌瘤的发病无相关性。 Objective: To detect the distribution of polymorphism at Sac I site G/C in the seventh extron of AHSG gene in patients with endometriosis, patients with myoma of uterus and normal controls. Methods: The polymorphism of Sac I site G/C in the seventh extron of AHSG gene was detected by polymerase chain reaction - restriction fragment length polymorphism in patients with endometriosis ( n = 98), patients with myoma of uterus ( n = 97 ) and normal controls ( n = 99) . Results: The frequencies of GG GC, CC and genotypes were 32.65%, 57. 14% and 10. 20% in patients with endometriosis, while 75.26%, 22. 68% and 2. 06%, in patients with myoma of uterus, and 74. 75%, 23. 23% and 2. 02% in normal controls. A significant difference was seen in the distribution frequency of AHSG genotype between patients with endometriosls and patients with myoma of uterus, patients with endometriosis and normal controls. There was no significant difference in the distribution frequency of AHSG genotype between patients with myoma of uterus and normal controls. Conclusion: The distribution frequency of Al - ISO gem type has something to do with mobility of endometriosis but has nothing to do with that of myoma of uterus.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第18期2585-2587,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 子宫内膜异位症 子宫肌瘤 α2-HS糖蛋白 基因 遗传多态性 Endometriosis Myoma of uterus AHSG G- erne Polymorphism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献40

  • 1Theobald TM, Cauley JA, Gluer CC, Bunker CH, Ukoli FA, Genant HK. Black-white differences in hip geometry. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8:61-7.
  • 2Mann V, Ralston SH. Meta-analysis of COL1A1 Spl polymorphism in relation to bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture. Bone 2003; 32: 711-7.
  • 3Reginster JY, Burlet N. Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence.Bone 2006; 38: S4-9.
  • 4Ammann P, Rizzoli R. Bone strength and its determinants.Osteoporos Int 2003; 14 Suppl 3: S13-8.
  • 5Bouxsein ML. Bone quality: where do we go from here?Osteoporos Int 2003; 14 Suppl 5:118-27.
  • 6Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, Jamsa T. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 274-80.
  • 7Looker AC, Beck TJ. Maternal history of osteoporosis and femur geometry. Calcif Tissue Int 2004; 75: 277-85.
  • 8Peacock M, Turner CH, Econs M J, Foroud T. Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 2002; 23: 303-26.
  • 9Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Gualtieri G, Malavolta N. Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 729-33.
  • 10Gnudi S, Malavolta N, Testi D, Viceconti M. Differences in proximal femur geometry distinguish vertebral from femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic women. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 219-23.

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部