期刊文献+

毛竹林与马尾松林土壤生物学性质及微生物功能多样性比较 被引量:10

Comparison on Soil Biological Properties and Microbial Function Diversities between Phyllostachys heterocycal var.pubescens and Pinus massoniana Forest
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨不同土地利用方式对土壤微生物多样性及土壤质量的影响,采集了毛竹林与马尾松林土壤进行分析。结果表明,马尾松林土壤有机质(TOC)、全氮(T-N)和水解氮(H-N)含量明显高于毛竹林(p<0.05);而土壤有效磷(A-P)和有效钾(A-K)则两者没有差异。马尾松林土壤微生物量碳(MBC)含量明显高于毛竹林(p<0.05)。反映土壤微生物活性的平均吸光值(AWCD)和土壤微生物功能多样性Shannon指数和McIntosh指数,马尾松林土壤同样显著高于毛竹林土壤。以上结果说明,天然马尾松林相比毛竹林具有土壤养分丰富,微生物含量高、活性大,且多样性丰富等特点,是较稳定的生态系统。 Study was made on effect of different land management on soil microbial diversity and soil quality. Analysis on soil of Phyllostachys heterocycal var. pubescens and Pinus massoniana forest demonstrated that total organic carbon(TOC), total nitrogen(T-N) and hydrolysable nitrogen(H-N) content in pine forest was richer than that in bamboo stands, while the content of available phosphorus(A-P) and available potassium(A-K) was similar between two stands. Soil of pine forest had higher microbial biomass carbon (MBC) content than that of bamboo stand (P 〈 0.05). Besides, Shannon index and Mclntosh index showed soil of pine forest had higher microbial activity and microbial function diversities than that of bamboo forest(P〈0.01). It can be concluded that pine system is better than bamboo one from the view of soil quality and ecosystem stability.
出处 《浙江林业科技》 北大核心 2008年第3期8-12,共5页 Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30271072) 浙江省自然科学基金(301250) 浙江省"151"人才基金联合资助
关键词 土地利用 土壤养分 土壤微生物量碳 土壤微生物多样性 land management soil nutrient soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) soil microbial functional diversity
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1MacArthur R. Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability[J]. Ecology, 1955 ( 36 ) : 533 - 537.
  • 2Naeem S, Thompson L J, Lawton J H, et al. Empirical evidence that decreasing species diversity may alter the performance of terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Phil Trans R Sco Lond, 1995 ( 347 ) : 249 - 262.
  • 3Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems[J]. Nature, 1996 ( 379 ) : 718 -720.
  • 4Hooper D U, Vitousek P M. The effect of streptomycin, cycloheximide, fungizone, captan, carbofuran, cygon, and PCNB on soil microorganisms[J]. Microbial Ecology, 1997 ( 10 ) : 345 - 58.
  • 5Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, et al. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem process[J]. Science, 1997 ( 277 ) : 1 300- 1 302.
  • 6Wardle D A, Zackrisson O, Hornberg G, et al. The influence of island area on ecosystem properties[J]. Science, 1997 ( 277 ) : 1 296 - 1 299.
  • 7杨官品,男兰,贾海波,朱艳红,刘英杰,张凯.土壤细菌遗传多样性及其与植被类型相关性研究[J].Acta Genetica Sinica,2000,27(3):278-282. 被引量:32
  • 8姚槐应,何振立,黄昌勇.不同土地利用方式对红壤微生物多样性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):51-54. 被引量:70
  • 9Lawton J H. What do species do in ecosystems? [J]. Oikos, 1994 ( 71 ) : 367 - 374,
  • 10McNaughton S J. Diversity and stability[J]. Nature, 1998 ( 333 ) : 204 - 205.

二级参考文献25

  • 1金则新.浙江天台山种子植物区系分析[J].广西植物,1994,14(3):211-215. 被引量:38
  • 2杨一川,庄平,黎系荣.峨眉山峨眉栲、华木荷群落研究[J].植物生态学报,1994,18(2):105-120. 被引量:75
  • 3Clay K,et al. Fungal endophyte symbiosis and plant diversity in successional fields[J]. Science, 1999,285 (5434):1742--1744.
  • 4Heijden M G, Klironomos J h, Ursic M. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and oroductivity[J]. Nature, 1998, 396(6706): 69--72.
  • 5Sugden A M. Ecology:diversity and ecosystem resilience[J]. Science, 2000, 290(5490): 233--235.
  • 6Frostegard A, et al. Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals[J]. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59(11):3605--3617.
  • 7Campbell C D, Grayston S J, Hirst D J. Use of rhizosphere carbon sources in sole carbon source tests to diaxriminate soil m-crobial communities[J]. Journal Microbiological Methods, 1997,30 (1) : 33 -- 41.
  • 8Pandey A , Palni L M S. The rhizosphere effect of tea on soil microbes in a Himalayan monsoonal location[J]. Biology Fertility of Soils, 1996, 21(3):131--137.
  • 9Pandey A ,Palni L M S, Coulomb N. Antifungal activity of bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of established tea bushes[J]. Microbiological Research, 1997,125(1):105--112.
  • 10Garland J L. Analysis and interpretation of community-level physiological profiles in microbial ecology[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,1997, 24(4 ) :289--300.

共引文献496

同被引文献158

引证文献10

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部