存在封存期权时突变因素对企业决策的影响被引量：3

Effect of Unexpected Factors on Firms' Decisions When New Technology Commercialization Project Can Be Suspended

下载PDF

导出

摘要将新技术商品价格描述为混合的布朗运动/泊松跳跃过程,考察未来可能出现的能使价格发生突然改变的因素对企业新技术商业化决策的影响,通过模型的一组模拟数值解给出了特定情况下企业进入、封存、重启和退出的临界值,并研究了各临界值对泊松过程参数的依赖,同时发现由于存在封存和重启项目的可能性,降低了企业投资和退出的临界值。 Under the assumption that the price of new technology commodities follows a mixed Brownian motion/Poisson jump process, strategic decisions of enterprise are analyzed and the impact of the factors which can lead the commodities＇ price to a jump change on the corporations＇ decisions is investigated. By certain numerical illustration, our research presents the optimal entry, suspension, restart and exit thresholds, and the dependence of these thresholds on Poisson parameters is studied. Further, the research finds that the possibility of suspending and restarting a project can decrease the firm＇s optimal entry and exit thresholds.

作者袁蔡群仝允桓唐方成

机构地区清华大学技术创新研究中心

出处《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2008年第3期50-56,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management Science

基金国家自然科学基金重点(70233001) 高等院校博士学科专项基金项目(0510309)

关键词新技术商业化封存跳跃过程决策临界值 new technology commercialization suspend jump process decision-making thresholds

分类号 F272.3 [经济管理—企业管理] F830.59 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1[美]Avinash K.Dixit,Robert S Pindyck.不确定条件下的投资[M].朱勇等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:199-228.
2Farzin Y H, Huisman K J M, Kort P M. Optimal timing of technology adoption[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1998, 22(5) :77-799.
3Spiros H. Martzoukos, Lenos Trigeorgis. Real(investment) options with multiple sources of rare events[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 136: 696-706.
4夏晖,曾勇,唐小我.企业采用新技术的最优时机研究[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(6):607-614. 被引量：16
5李强,曾勇.不确定环境下企业技术创新投融资决策研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):32-38. 被引量：14
6Luis H. R. Alvarez, Rune Stenbacka. Adoption of uncertain multi-stage technology projects:a real options approach [J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2001, 35:71 - 97.
7Kuno J. M. Huisman, Peter M. Kort. Strategic technology adoption taking into account future technological improvements: a real options approach [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 159(3) : 705-728.
8Jean-Paul Decamps. Thomas Mariotti. Investment timing and learning externalities[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2004, 118:80 - 102.
9Helen Weeds. Strategic delay in a real options model of R&D competition [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69:729-747.
10Robert J. Kauffman, Xiaotong Li. Technology competition and optimal investment timing: a real options perspective [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 2005, 52(1) :15-29.

二级参考文献33

1杨壬飞,仝允桓.新技术商业化及其评价的研究综述[J].科学学研究,2004,22(z1):82-88. 被引量：22
2夏晖,曾勇,唐小我.企业采用新技术的最优时机研究[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(6):607-614. 被引量：16
3Oster S. The diffusion of innovation among steel firms: The basic oxygen furnace[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1982, 13( 1 ):45-56.
4Sumrall J B. Diffusion of the basic oxygen furnace in the U.S. steel industry[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1982, 30(4):421-437.
5Amram M, Kulatilaka N. Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World[ M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
6Trigeorgis L. Real Options-managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
7Grenadier S R, Weiss A M. Investment in technological innovations: An option pricing approach[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997, 44(3): 397-416.
8Farzin Y H, Huisman K J M, et al. Optimal timing of technology adoption[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1998,22(5): 779-799.
9Mason R, Weeds H. Networks, Options and Preemption[ R]. Coventry: University of Warwick, 2000.
10Huisman K J M, Kort P M. Strategic technology investment under uncertainty[ J]. OR-Spektrum, 2002, 24 : 79-98.