期刊文献+

Dyract flow流动复合体治疗年轻恒牙窝沟龋的临床效果观察 被引量:1

Clinical Observation on Efficacy of Dyract Flow Composite in Treating Fossa Decay of Young Permanent Teeth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察Dyract flow流动复合体治疗年轻恒牙窝沟龋的临床疗效。方法选择6~18岁恒牙窝沟龋201例,共441颗牙,随机分为两组:实验组100例(220颗牙),采用Dyract flow流动复合体充填;对照组101例(221颗牙),采用可见光固化窝沟封闭剂充填。结果随访3年Dyract flow流动复合体组充填后1、2、3年的涂膜保留率均比可见光固化窝沟封闭剂组高(<0.05)。结论Dyract flow流动复合体治疗年轻恒牙窝沟龋的疗效确切,可以在临床推广应用。 Objective To observe clinical efficacy of Dyract flow composite in treating fossa decay of young permanent teeth. Methods 201 patients (441 teeth) with fossa decay of young permanent teeth at age of 6-18 years old were divided into two groups at random. The test group (100 cases, 220 teeth) were filled with Dyract folw composite, and the control group were filled with visible light curing pits and fissures sealents. Results It was found in the 3 year follow-up, the rate of film preseration is higher in the test group than that in the control group at 1, 2 and 3 years after filling. Conclusion Clinical efficacy of Dyract flow composite for treating fossa decay of young permanent teeth is positive. This method can be used widely in the clinical oractice.
作者 柳红荣 张岩
出处 《医学新知》 CAS 2008年第3期140-142,共3页 New Medicine
关键词 流动复合体 窝沟龋 窝沟封闭剂 flow composite fossa decay pits and fissures sealant
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1谢富强.Dyract flow流动复合体和光固化窝沟封闭剂3年效果评价[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2003,19(1):69-70. 被引量:24
  • 2Rock W P, Weatherill S, Anderson R T. Retention of three fissure sealant resins. The effects of etching agent and curing method. Results over 3 years[J]. Br Dent J ,1990,168(8): 323-325.
  • 3Williams B ,Laxton L,Holt R D,et al.Fissure sealants: A 4 year clinical trial comparing an experimental glass polyalkenoate cement with a bis glycidyl methacrylater resin used as fissure sealants[J].Br Dent J, 1996,180 (3):104-107.

共引文献23

同被引文献24

  • 1谢富强.预防性Dyractflow流动复合体充填窝沟龋的临床效果[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(3):409-411. 被引量:5
  • 2徐美玉.Dyract flow流动复合体与光固化窝沟封闭剂治疗磨牙窝沟龋的临床比较[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(4):562-563. 被引量:5
  • 3Simonsen RJ. Stallard RE. Sealant-restorations utilizing a diluted filled resin:One year results[J]. Quintessence Int. 1977, 8(6): 77.
  • 4Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports ofrandomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary[J]. Control Clinic Trials, 1996,17(1): 1-12.
  • 5王忠, 周莹. 不同预防性充填材料临床效果分析[J]. 健康必读,2012,11(10):208-209.
  • 6Jafarzadeh M, Malekafzali B, Tadayon N, et al. Retention of a FlowableComposite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant:One-year Follow-up[J].Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of MedicalSciences,2010, 7(1): 1-5.
  • 7Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Gareia L, et al. Randimized, controlled trialcomparing the retention of a flowable restorative systerm with a conventionalresin sealant: one-year follow up[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent,2005,15(1): 44-50.
  • 8Oba AA, Sonmez IS, Ercan E, et al. Comparison of retention rates of fissuresealants using two flowable restoration materials and conventional resin sealant:two-year follow-up[J]. Med Princ Prut, 2012, 21(3): 234-237.
  • 9Rabello T. Research proposal: evaluation of the ART approach in elderlypatients[J]. J Appl Oral Sci,2006,14(spe): 30-33.
  • 10Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports ofmeta-analyses of randomized controlled trials the QUOROM statement Qualityreporting of meta-analyses[J].Lancet,1999,354(9193):1896-1900.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部