期刊文献+

质子交换膜燃料电池的组装(锁紧力)对其寿命性能的影响(英文)

Influence of Assembly Force in a PEMFC under a Lifetime Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 系统考察质子交换膜燃料电池组装(锁紧力,0.45-11.3 MPa)对其性能和寿命的影响,并确定了最佳锁紧力.以最佳锁紧力(3.2 MPa)的单电池作2000 h寿命测试,根据该单电池不同运行时间下的极化和功率曲线分析,得到与其活化区对应的电化学参数.XRD检测表明,电池组装施加的锁紧力不但影响电池的接触电阻,而且还影响由MEA微观结构决定的电池反应动力学性能.在最佳锁紧力作用下运行2000 h后的单电池在大电流密度区出现了明显的性能衰减,这主要是由于催化剂的团聚效应引起的.但在非最佳锁紧力作用下,阴极催化剂的团聚作用远大于阳极催化剂. The lifetime performance was investigated by assembling the single cell of PEMFC under a series of holding forces ranging from 0.45 to 11.3 MPa and reassembled under optimal holding force. The polarization and power density curves were obtained during different periods of operating time up to 2000 hours and the fuel cell catalyst activation regions in the polarization curves were analyzed to evaluate the electrochemical kinetic parameters. The results revealed that the holding forces affected not only the internal contact resistances, but also the kinetic parameters which might be caused by the change of the MEA microstructures. The apparent degradation observed at higher current densities after 2000 h lifetime test under the optimal holding force of 3.2 MPa was due mainly to the increases of the catalyst particle sizes. However, the agglomeration in the particle sizes of cathode catalyst after 2000 h lifetime test at 3.2 MPa was less severe than that without optimal assembly force control.
出处 《电化学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期190-196,共7页 Journal of Electrochemistry
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(20433060)
关键词 质子交换膜燃料电池 接触电阻 电池锁紧力 膜电极 寿命性能 proton exchange membrane fuel cell contact resistance assembly force membrane electrode assembly lifetime performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Hinds G. Performance and durability of PEM fuel cells : A review. NPL Report DEPC-MPE 002, Vol. Teddington Middlesex UK TW11 [ M ]. 0LW: National Physical Laboratory, 2004.
  • 2Cheng X, Chen L, Peng C, et al. Catalyst microstructure examination of PEMFC membrane electrode assem: blies vs. time [ J ]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2004, 151: 48-52.
  • 3Cheng X, Peng C, You M, et al. Characterization of catalysts and membrane in DMFC lifetime testing [ J ]. Electrochimica Acta, 2006, 51: 4620-4625.
  • 4Knights S D, Colbow K M, St-Pierre J, et al. Aging mechanisms and lifetime of PEFC and DMFC [ J ]. Journal of Power Sources 2004, 127 : 127-134.
  • 5Cleghom S J C, Mayfield D K, Moore D A, et al. A polymer electrolyte fuel cell life test : 3 years of continuous operation [ J ]. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 158 : 446-456.
  • 6Huang X, Solasi R, Zou Y, et al. Mechanical endurance of polymer electrolyte membrane and PEM fuel cell durability [ J ]. Journal of Polymer Science Part B : Polymer Physics, 2006, 44: 2346-2357.
  • 7Santarelli M G, Torehio M F. Experimental analysis of the effects of the operating variables on the performance of a single PEMFC [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2007, 48: 40-51.
  • 8Neyerlin K C, Gasteiger Hubert A, Mittelsteadt Cortney K, et al. Effect of relative humidity on oxygen reduction kinetics in a PEMFC [J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2005,152 : 1073-1080.
  • 9Cho E, Lee J, Kim H,et al. Effects of shutdown procedure on long-term stability of PEM fuel cells [ C ]// PBFC2_B - Second International Conference on Polymer Batteries and Fuel Cells Vol. Las Vegas: Nevada, 2005.
  • 10Lee Wk, Ho C H, Zee J W V, et al. The effects of compression and gas diffusion layers on the performance of a PEM fuel cell [ J]. Journal of Power Sources, 1999, 84: 45-51.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部