期刊文献+

收取排污费和规定排放标准的比较 被引量:3

A Comparative Study of Sewage Charge Collection and Emission Standard Provision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在环境立法中,为遏制污染,有收取排污费和规定污染排放标准两种选择.结合我国实际以及其他各国立法与实践的经验,认为收取排污费比直接规定污染排放标准更为有效,建议现阶段缓行排污权交易. Collection of sewage charges and provision of pollution emission standards are two options for environmental legislation to curb pollution. Based on an analysis of national condition of China, the in-ternational practice and experience, collection of sewage charges is proposed to be more effective than a direct provision of pollution emission standard in China. Emissions trading is not considered to be resaonable at present.
作者 侯怀霞
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期777-781,共5页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
关键词 环境立法 排污费 排放标准 environmental legislation sewage charges emission standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献2

同被引文献30

  • 1白千文.超标排污费的经济学批判[J].湖州师范学院学报,2005,27(6):80-83. 被引量:4
  • 2杨兴,郑荷花.解读《排污费征收使用管理条例》[J].生态经济,2006,22(9):32-35. 被引量:4
  • 3陈宏.论总量控制中的排污收费制度及排污权交易制度[J].海峡科学,2007(2):40-40. 被引量:4
  • 4Jerrold M.Peterson. Estimating an effluent Charge:The Reserve Mining Case[M].Wisconsin:The University of Wisconsin Press,1977.328-341.
  • 5Michael Braulke,Alfred Endres. On the Economics of Effluent Charge[M].1985.891-897.
  • 6Baron,R.M,David A.K. Moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,(51):1173-1182.
  • 7Jerrold M Peterson.Estimating an effluent Charge:The Reserve Mining Case[]..1977
  • 8Duke University School of Law.The effulent fee approach for controlling air pollution[]..1970
  • 9Vinish Kathuria,Nisar.A Khan.Environmental Compliance versus Growth[]..2002
  • 10Eli Feinerman,Yakir Plessner,Dafna M Disegni.Recycled Effluent:Should the Polluter Pay[]..2001

引证文献3

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部