如来藏与“寂”“觉”之辨——论印顺与吕瀓的如来藏思想的差异

Tathagata-garbha and the Analysis of "Nirvana" and "Bodhi "——On the Difference between Yin Shun’s and Lü Cheng’s Thought of Tathagata-garbha

印顺和吕瀓在"性寂"和"性觉"问题上的争议体现出二者如来藏思想的差异。吕瀓认为,《大乘起信论》的特点是"性觉"。他从"所"、"染"和"寂"的角度诠释《楞伽经》的如来藏。而在印顺看来,《大乘起信论》的"性觉"思想部分来自于"扶南大乘",《楞伽经》如来藏的结构是真妄和合。他认为,"性寂"和"性觉"两条理路是可以互相发明和会通的。

The controversies on ＂ inherent nirvana＂（性寂） and ＂inherent intelligence＂ （性觉） manifest the difference between Yin Shun＇s and Lü Cheng＇s thoughts on tathagata-garbha. Lü Cheng held that Mahayana-shraddhotpada-shastra or the Awakening of Faith is characterized by ＂inherent intelligence＂. And he interpreted the tathagata-garbha in Lankavatara-sutra or Into Lanka Mountain from the perspectives of ＂reason＂ , ＂pollution＂ and ＂nirvana＂. However, as far as Yin Shun is concerned, ＂inherent intelligence＂ in Mahayana- shraddhotpada-shastra derived in part from Funan maha-yana, and the tathagata-garbha in Lankavatara-sutra consists of ＂truth＂ and ＂falsity＂ in structure. So, Yin Shun thought the two paths of＂inherent intelligence＂ and ＂inherent nirvana＂ can promote and learn from each other.