期刊文献+

自体骨髓间充质干细胞移植对急性心肌梗死后心律失常影响的实验研究 被引量:11

Effect of bone mesenchymal stem cells transplantation on malignant ventricular arrhythmia induced by electrophysiological stimulation in a mini-swine model of acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察自体骨髓间充质干细胞(MSC)移植对小型猪心肌梗死后心律失常的影响,并研究其作用机制。方法利用介入方法制作小型猪心肌梗死模型并进行自体MSC移植。MSC移植组12头和心肌梗死对照组10头,分别于移植2h及4周后通过电生理程序刺激,观察室性心动过速(室速)的发生情况。于建模4周后,通过膜片钳技术研究移植后MSC在心肌环境下的离子通道表达和梗死区域心电异质性变化。结果(1)建模后2hMSC移植组9头(75%)、对照组9头(90%)诱发出室速,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.445)。木后4周MSC移植组3头(25%)、对照组8头(80%)可诱发出持续性单形性室速(P=0.012)。(2)MSC移植组的心外膜细胞(Epi)、心内膜细胞(Endo)和中层细胞(M)INa峰值电流密度分别为(-12.43±3.04)pA/pF、(-14.04±3.82)pA/pF和(-29.26±5.70)pA/pF,对照组梗死边缘区的Epi、Endo和M层INa峰值电流密度分别为(-8.47±3.34)pA/pF、(-9.71±3.38)pA/pF和(-18.98±4.05)pA/pF;MSC移植组在三层心肌的表达具有异质性,与对照组相比差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。(3)MSC移植未室速组MSC的Epi、Endo和M层INa失活半数电压分别为(-93.1±13.8)mV、(-95.2±15.5)mV和(-103.4±8.7)mV,MSC移植室速组分别为(-126.2±10.9)mV、(-106.7±11.9)mV和(-105.4±11.0)mV,心肌梗死室速组分别为(-129.1±10.9)mV、(-112.2±9.9)mV和(-109.7±9.3)mV,MSC移植室速组和心肌梗死室速组相比各层差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),和MSC移植未室速组相比各层差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。(4)多元logistic回归分析表明INa失活半数电压(RR=1.449,95%CI 1.276-2.079,P=0.029)、INa峰值密度(RR=1.092,95%CI 1.008-1.917,P=0.012)是影响心肌梗死室性心律失常的独立危险因素。结论自体MSC移植致心律失常可能性较小,且有抑制梗死后心律失常发生的作用。自体MSC在心肌内可分化成为具有心肌细胞离子通道特性的类心肌细胞,其离子通道分化程度可能是影响室性心律失常发生的主要机制。 Objective To investigate the effects of autologous bone mesenchymal stem cells(MSC) transplantation on malignant arrhythmia induced by electrophysiological (EP) stimulation and cardiomyocyte ion channels remodeling in a minl-swine model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Immediately after AMI (LAD occluded for 120 min) , MSC (10 × 10^7, labeled by colloidal gold and cocultivated with 5-azacytidine, 5-aza, n = 12) or equal volume saline (n = 10) were injected through overthe-wire (OTW) balloon in LAD at distal over D1. EP stimulation is performed after 2 hours and 4 weeks in both groups to induce arrhythmia. The variance of heterogeneity of sodium currents ( INa ) and INa steady-state inactivation curves in different zones of infracted wall were investigated by patch clamp technology and the relationship between ionic channel and ventrieular arrhythmia is analyzed. Results EP induced malignant ventricular arrhythmia (VT) rate was similar (MSC 75% vs. saline 90% , P =0.455) at 2 hours post AMI and was significantly lower in MSC group (25% vs. 80%, P =0. 012) at 4 weeks post AMI. The Peak INa current densities of the Endo, Media and Epi were significantly lower in MSC group [ ( - 14. 04 ±3.82) pA/pF, ( - 29.26 ± 5.70) pA/pF, ( - 12.43 ± 3.04) pA/pF] compared those in saline group [ ( - 9.71 ± 3.38 ) pA/pF,( -18.98 ±4.05) pA/pF,( -8.47 ±3.34) pA/pF, all P 〈0.05]. The INa steady-state inactivation curves of the Epi, Endo and Media in mini-swine with VT in MSC group [ ( - 126. 2 ± 10.9) mV, ( - 106.7 ± 11.9) mV, ( - 105.4 ± 11.0) mV ] were similar as those in saline group with VT [ ( - 129.1 ± 10.9) mV, ( - 112.2 ± 9.9) mV, ( - 109.7 ± 9.2) mV, all P 〉 0.05 ] while significantly lower compared to MSC group without VT [ ( -93.1 ± 13.8) mV, ( -95.2 ± 15.5) mV, ( - 103.4 ±8.7) mV, all P 〈0.05]. The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that INa current density( RR = 1. 449, 95% CI 1. 276-2. 079, P = 0. 029) and INa steady-state inactivation curves( RR = 1. 092, 95% CI 1. 008- 1. 917,P = 0. 012) were the independent factors for reduced VT. Conclusions Autologous MSC attenuated malignant ventrieular arrhythmia induced by EP at 4 weeks in mini-swine with AMI which might due to altered eardiomyocyte ion channels remodeling induced by MSC.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期546-550,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
基金 河北省科技厅指导性科研项目(062761198)
关键词 干细胞 心肌梗死 细胞移植 心律失常 膜片钳术 Stem cells Myocardial infarction Cell transplantation Arrhythmia Patch clamp techniques
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Wollert KC, Meyer GP, Lotz J, et al. Intracoronary autologous bone-marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction:the BOOST randomized clinical trial. Lancet ,2004,364 : 141-148.
  • 2黄榕翀,葛均波.骨髓干细胞移植治疗急性心肌梗死研究现状[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):497-499. 被引量:9
  • 3陈晓春,单鸿伟,瞿海龙,葛均波,葛智平.骨髓间充质干细胞移植加重大鼠主动脉血管成形术后再狭窄程度[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(9):802-806. 被引量:21
  • 4Antzelevitch C, Sicouri S, Litovsky SH, et al. Heterogeneity within the ventricular wall. Electrophysiology and pharmacology of epicardial, endocardial, and M cells. Circ Res, 1991,69 : 1427- 1449.
  • 5Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, et al. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2001,98 : 10344-10349.
  • 6Makkar RR, Lill M, Chen PS. Stem cell therapy for myocardial repair: is it arrhythmogenic? J Am Coil Cardio, 2003,42: 2070- 2072.
  • 7Menasche P, Hagege AA, Vilquin JT, et al. Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for severe postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction, J Am Coil Cardiol, 2003, 41: 1078-1083.
  • 8Sun W, Sarma JS, Singh BN. Electrophysiological effects of dronedarone (SR33589), a noniodinated benzofuran derivative, in the rabbit heart: comparison with amiodarone. Circulation, 1999, 100: 2276-2281.
  • 9Liu DW, Gintant GA, Antzelevitch C, et al. Ionic bases for electrophysiological distinctions among epicardial, midmyocardial, and endocardial myocytes from the free wall of the canine left ventricle. Circ Res, 1993, 72: 671-687.
  • 10Sicouri S, Antzelevitch C. A subpopulation of cells with unique electrophysiologlcal properties in the deep subepicardium of the canine ventricle. The M cell. Circ Res, 1991,68:1729-1741.

二级参考文献21

  • 1孟玲,刘国树,曹丰,牛丽丽,高艳红,张鹏,赵连旭,李艳华,裴雪涛.经静脉途径移植骨髓间充质干细胞修复梗死心肌的可行性与安全性研究[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2005,7(3):184-187. 被引量:7
  • 2姚康,黄榕翀,葛雷,钱菊英,李延林,徐世坤,张峰,章轶琦,牛玉宏,史剑慧,张少衡,樊冰,王齐冰,孙爱军,邹云增,葛均波.经冠状动脉自体骨髓单个核细胞移植治疗急性心肌梗死的安全性观察[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(7):577-581. 被引量:16
  • 3Strauer BE, Brehm M, Zeus T, et al. Repair of infarcted myocardium by autologous intracoronary mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in humans. Circulation, 2002,106( 15 ) :1913- 1918.
  • 4Meyer GP, Wollert KC, Lotz J, et al.Intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: eighteen months' follow-up data from the randomized, controlled BOOST (BOne marrow transfer to enhance ST-ehvation infarct regeneration) trial.Circulation, 2006, 113 (10) : 1287-1294.
  • 5Wollert KC, Meyer GP, Lotz J, et al. Intracoronary autologous bone-marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: the BOOST randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet, 2004, 364 ( 9429 ) : 141-148.
  • 6Assmus B, Schachinger V, Teupe C, et aL Transplantation of Progenitor Cells and Regeneration Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction ( TOPCARE-AMI ) . Circulation, 2002, 106 (24) :3009-3017.
  • 7Kang HJ, Kim HS, Zhang SY, et al. Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilized with granulocytecolony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and resterosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction : MAGIC cell randomized clinical trial. Lancet, 2004, 363 ( 9411 ): 751- 756.
  • 8Kang HI, Lee HI, Na SH, et al. Differential effect of intracoronary infusion of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on left ventricular function and remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction versus old myocardial infarction: the MAGIC Cell-3-DES randomized, controlled trial. Circulation, 2006, 114(1Suppl) :I145-I151.
  • 9Schachinger V, Erbs S, Elsasser A, et al.intracoronary bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med, 2006, 355(12) :1210-1221.
  • 10Lunde K, Solheim S, Aakhus S, et al. Intracoronary injection of mononuclear bone marrow stem cell in acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med, 2006, 355(12):1199-1209.

共引文献29

同被引文献158

引证文献11

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部