期刊文献+

X-ER构式下的事件名词 被引量:2

Eventive Nominals of the X-ER Derivative Pattern
下载PDF
导出
摘要 X-er名词向来被以偏概全称为"施事名词",但X-ER构式实际可以编码"施事"以外的诸多语义角色,其指称范围涵盖人、物、事件等范畴,语义范围涵盖施事、受事、工具、处所甚至时间等语义格,词基X牵涉多种词类。X-ER构式下的"事件"名词具有与"物件"意义上的X-er名词相同的概念结构,也可再划分为施(致)事性、受事性、工具性等次类,而除此还有一类无法分析为具体语义角色的X-er"事件"名词。X-er事件名词的生成既遵循"事件即物件"这一总喻,同时在某种程度上也受制于转喻的认知模式。 Improperly labeled as “agentive nouns”, the X-er nominals actually encode more semantic roles than Agent. With their base covering various parts of speech, the X-er nominals can have people, things, and events as their referents, and encode such semantic roles as Agent, Patient, Instrument, Locative, and even Time. The eventive nouns of the X-ER derivative pattern are conceptually parallel to the object-level X-er nominals, in that they can also be divided into such types as Agent/ Causer, Patient and Instrument. X-er can also encode eventive nominals that imply no specific semantic role. The generation of the eventive X-er nominals is governed by the generic EVENTS ARE OBJECTS metaphor, yet metonymy' also plays a significant role in their construal.
作者 张高远
出处 《北京第二外国语学院学报》 2008年第6期26-31,共6页 Journal of Beijing International Studies University
关键词 X-er名词 事件名词 隐喻 转喻 X-er nominals eventive nouns metaphor metonymy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[1]Chomsky,N.Remarks on Nominalization[A].In Ja-cobs,R.A.& Rosenbaum,P.S.,eds,Readings in English Transformational Grammar[C].Waltham,Mass.:Ginn,1970:184~221.
  • 2[2]Fraser,B.Some Remarks on the Action Nominalization in English[A].In Jacobs,R.A.& Rosenbaum,P.S.,eds,Readings in English Transformational Gram-mar[C].Waltham,Mass.:Ginn,1970:83~98.
  • 3[3]Heyvaert,L.A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nomi-nalization in English[M].Berlin & New York:Mou-ton de Gruyter,2003.
  • 4[4]Heyvaert,L.Deverbal -er Suffixation as the Equivalent of the Clausal Subject-Finite Unit[J].Word,2003,(1):39~68.
  • 5[5]Langacker,R.W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol.Ⅱ):Descriptive Application[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1991.
  • 6[6]Levin,B.& Rappaport,M.Nonevent -er Nominals:A Probe into Argument Structure[J].Linguistics,1988,(26):1067~1083.
  • 7[7]Panther,Klans-Uwe & Thorngurg,L.L.The Roles of Metaphor and Metonymy in -er Nominals[A].In Dirven,René& Porings,Ralf,eds,Metaphor and Me-tonymy in Comparison and Contrast[C].Berlin:Mou-ton de Gruyter,2002:279~319.
  • 8[8]Quirk,R.,et al.A Grammar of Contemporary English[M].Essex:Longman Group Ltd.,1972.
  • 9[9]Quirk,R.,et al.A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language[M].London&New York:Long-man,1985.
  • 10[10]Rappaport Hovav,M.& Levin,B.-ER Nominals:Implications for the Theory of Argument Structure[A].In StoweU,T.& Wehrli,E.,eds,Syntax and Semantics.Volume 26:Syntax and the Lexicon[C].New York:Academic Press,1992:217~153.

同被引文献3

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部