期刊文献+

新合作主义在我国利益协调中的适用性分析 被引量:2

On Applicability of Neo-Cooperatism in China's Intersts Coordination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 社会转型期的中国呈现出多元的利益结构形态,由此引发了大量的利益差别和利益矛盾。如何将日益分化的社会利益主体及其利益要求整合起来,使之有序地传输到国家的政治中枢系统,并通过政府来有效协调社会利益关系,是一个重大的现实问题。以强调阶层合作,主张协商妥协为根本特征的新合作主义可以为全面协调利益关系、化解矛盾、缓解冲突、寻求社会和谐提供独特的研究角度。 The pluralistic structure of the interests become formation in China's social transition period, it produce a large number of different interests and conflicts, such itself will not automatically generate a harmonious and balanced the structure of interests. This proposed a major practical problems to the government: how to integration the divided multi-parties of interests and transfer to the country's political hub system in orderly, which through government effectively to coordinate interests. To emphasize the class, advocated consultation compromise the fundamental characteristics of the neocorporatism can be no doubt provided a unique perspective about overall coordination of interests, resolve conflicts and conflict mitigation, seek social harmony.
作者 马建斌
出处 《开放导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期64-67,共4页 China Opening Journal
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关题目<公共服务型政府构建研究>(05JZD00021)子课题
关键词 利益分化 政府 新合作主义 Interests differentiation, Government, Neo-corporatism
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1P. C. Schmitter. Corporatism as OrganizationaL Practice and Political Theory, in W, M, Laffertv and E, Rosenstein, International Handbook of Participation in Organizations[M]. New York: Oxford University Press,1993,P,327.
  • 2戴维·米勒.布莱克维尔政治学百科全书[M].中国政法大学出版社.2002:186-187.
  • 3Philippe C. Schmitter, Still the Century of Corporatism [J].review of Politics, Vol. 36, 1974,(1).
  • 4马秋莎.比较视角下中国合作主义的发展:以经济社团为例[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,22(2):126-138. 被引量:35
  • 5张静.'法团主义'模式下的工会角色.工会理论与实践,2001,(2).
  • 6邵明昭.法团主义:整合多元利益主体的一个新视角[J].宁夏党校学报,2006,8(6):81-84. 被引量:3

二级参考文献39

  • 1.《江泽民七一讲话》[N].《人民日报》,2001年7月.
  • 2马秋莎. Classification, Regulation, and Managerial Structure: A Preliminary Inquire of the Governance of Chinese NGOs, in S. Hasan and M. Lyons. Social Capital in Asian Sustainable Development Management: Examples and Lessons, New York: Nova Science Publishers. 2004, p. 23.
  • 3D.L. McNamara. Comparative Corporatism, in D. L. McNamara ed. , Corporatism and Korean Capitalism, London..Routledge. 1999, p. 9.
  • 4P.C. Schmitter. Corporatism as Organizational Practice and Political Theory, in W. M. Lafferty and E. Rosenstein,International Handbook of Participation in Organizations, New York: Oxford University Press. 1993, p. 327.
  • 5P.C. Sehmitter. Still the Century of Corporatism? in F. B. Pike and T. Striteh (eds.), The New Corporatism : Social-Political Structures in the Iberian World, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 1974, pp. 93 -94.
  • 6J. Unger and A. Chan, China, Corporatism, and the East Asian Model, The Australian Journal of Chinese S f fairs, vol. 33. 1995, pp. 31 - 32.
  • 7H.J. Wiarda. Corporatism and Comparative Politics:The Other Great " Ism', Armonk, NY:M.E. Sharp. 1997.
  • 8Schmitter. International Handbook of Participation in Organizations, p. 327.
  • 9H. J. Wiarda. Corporatism and Comparative Politics : The Other Great " Ism", Armonk, pp. 27 - 46.
  • 10P.S. Adams. Corporatism and Comparative Politics : Is There A New Century of Corparitism, in H.J. Wiarda ed. ,New Directions in Comparative Politics, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 2002, pp. 21 - 24.

共引文献49

同被引文献52

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部