摘要
碍于宪法的基本架构,违宪审查意义上的"宪法司法化"在我国绝无可能。但法官作为受宪法约束的公权力主体,基于其宪法义务,有在具体案件中对法律进行合宪性解释的必要。合宪性解释并非宪法解释,而是法律解释的一种方法。而且,合宪性解释已经从最初的法律解释方法转化成了法官的宪法义务。在部门法的研究中已经有在司法中进行合宪性解释的主张与尝试。合宪性解释可以在法律解释的体系解释、目的解释以及法外续造中应用。
Judicial review conflicts to China' s constitutional construction. There is no possibility that judges to interpret constitution. But as public authorities, judges are under a constitutional duty to interpret the laws according Constitution. The legal interpretation according Constitution is not constitutional interpre- tation, but one method of legal interpretation. The legal interpretation according Constitution has already not only an interpreting method, but a constitutional duty of judges. The legal interpretation according Constitution could be applied into legal interpretation in several levels, such as systematic interpretation and intentional interpretation.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期110-116,共7页
China Legal Science