《沧浪诗话》“混李杜为王孟”说辨

The Analyses about the Point "Regarding Li and Du as Wang and Meng" in CangLangShiHua

郭绍虞先生在《沧浪诗话校释》中提出了《沧浪诗话》存在"混李杜为王孟"的内在矛盾,而这一说法也代表了学界一种较为普遍的观点。本文在辨析《沧浪诗话》中"第一义"、"妙悟"、"兴趣"等核心概念的意义及其间关系的基础上,对这一说法提出商榷,认为这是对各概念意义及关系辨析不清所造成的误会,由此表明《沧浪诗话》的理论并不存在这样的矛盾。而后世"格调"与"神韵"两派的理论,则是对严羽的理论有所偏取,结合各自的取向而形成的。

Mr. Guo Shao-yu pointed out that Yan Yu, the author of CangLangShiHua, appearing to praise Li Bai and Du Fu in his publication, was in fact partial to Wang Wei and Meng Hao-ran. This comment is well accepted. Analyzing the critical points in CangLangShiHua and their relationship, I am going to discuss this problem in the paper and to show that the problem is actually a misunderstanding as a result of the confusion of the critical concepts. There is no paradox in CangLangShiHua. And the theories of two genres, GeDiao and ShenYon, were formed of their opinion and part of the Yan Yu＇s theory.