期刊文献+

非离子型与离子型造影剂不良反应的对比研究及预防 被引量:3

Comparison on Adverse Effects of Non-ionic and Ionic Contrast Agent
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨非离子型与离子型造影剂的不良反应,为有效预防造影剂不良反应提供科学依据。方法选取介入中心1258例接受非离子型造影剂的患者为实验组,746例接受离子型造影剂的患者为对照组,观察不良反应发生率,并分别在造影前后检测患者肾功能,数据用Z检验和t检验。结果实验组不良反应发生率为2.3%,对照组为4.6%,高于非离子型造影剂组(P<0.05)。两组患者造影前BUN、SCr无明显差异(P>0.05);造影后2d实验组患者的BUN、SCr低于对照组(P<0.05),CrCl高于对照组(P<0.05);造影后7 d两组患者的BUN、SCr、CrCl均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论非离子型造影剂不良反应发生率低于离子型造影剂,且对肾脏损伤较小,可以广泛应用于临床,并为控制其不良反应及肾毒性采取了有效措施。 Objective To explore the adverse effects of the non- ionic and ionic contrast agent for visualization, and to provide scientific evidence to prevent contrast induced adverse effects. Methods 746 cases who received nonionic contrast agent for visualization during 2007 year in municipal hospital of Heze city were selected as experimental group, and another 1258 cases that received ionic contrast agent were selected as control group. Then the patients' contrast induced adverse effects and kidney function index were observed and analyzed by SPSSll. 0. Results The adverse effects of the non-ionic contrast agent for visualization was 2.3 %, while the control group was 4.6 %, which was higher than that of the experimental group. There were no difference at the BUN and SCr level pre-visualization between the two groups, respectively (P 〉0.05). In addition, the patients' BUN, SCr, CrCl on the second day of post - visualization in experimental group were lower than that of the control group, respectively ( P〈 0.05 ). But the CrCl level were higher than that of the control group (P〈 0.05). Furthermore, the charge of patients BUN, SCr and CrCl on the seventh day of post - visualization between the two groups was no difference, respectively ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions The non - ionic contrast agent for visualization has lower adverse effects and less damage to the kidney, which can be applied widespread.
作者 苏丽霞
出处 《菏泽医学专科学校学报》 2008年第2期8-11,共4页 Journal of Heze Medical College
关键词 非离子型造影剂/副作用 离子型造影剂/副作用 肾损伤/病因学 non- ionic contrast agent/adverse effects ionic contrast agent/adverse effects kidney hurt/etiology
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献71

共引文献154

同被引文献53

  • 1王玉芹,蒿崑,全勇,吴艳春.提高碘造影剂过敏试验准确性的研究[J].护理研究,2005,19(30):2777-2778. 被引量:5
  • 2呼和巴拉,王亚梅,龚金山.CT造影剂致碘过敏反应100例分析[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2005,20(1):108-109. 被引量:2
  • 3沈辉,潘军,汪军,徐振华.欧乃派克引发特殊迟发过敏反应的分析及对策[J].实用医技杂志,2006,13(5):710-711. 被引量:8
  • 4慕朝伟,高润霖,陈纪林,杨跃进,乔树宾,姚民,秦学文,徐波,刘海波,吴永建,袁晋青,陈珏,李建军,戴军,尤士杰,窦克非,邱洪,王增武.非离子型碘造影剂的过敏样反应[J].中国循环杂志,2007,22(3):172-175. 被引量:44
  • 5Pablo AS,Giuseppe F.Frequency and predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy after angioplasty for chronic total occlusions[J].International Journal of Cardiology,2008,139(1):1-7.
  • 6Cheol UC,Seung WR.Extensive exfoliative dermatitis induced by nonionic contrast medium Iodixanol(Visipaque?) used during percutaneous coronary intervention[J].International Journal of Cardiology,2008,124:24-25.
  • 7Bruno R.Case reports of death after nonionic iodine contrast medium injection during spiral computed tomography scan performed for suspected pulmonary embolism[J].Patrick Ray MD Case Reports,2005,41(7):497-499.
  • 8Katayama H,Yamaguchi K,Kozuka T,et al.Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media:A report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media[J].Radiology,1990,175:621-628.
  • 9Lasser EC,Lyon SG,Berry CC.Reports on contrast media reactions:Analysis of data from reports to the U.S.Food and Drug Administration[J].Radiology,1997,203:605-610.
  • 10Morcos SK.Contrast-induced nephropathy:Are there differences between low osmolar and iso-osmolar iodinated contrast media?[J].Clinical Radiology,2009,64:468-472.

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部