企业规模与R&D集聚倾向关系的实证研究被引量：2

An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Firm Scale and R&D Agglomeration

下载PDF

导出

摘要理论和经验表明,受研发能力的影响,不同规模的企业在研发机构的区位选择和集聚倾向上有着明显的差异。大型企业研发的集聚倾向低于中小企业,中小企业研发集聚的主体特征非常明显。在详细论证企业规模特征与其R&D集聚倾向之间相互关系的基础上,以我国企业研发选址为例,实证比较不同规模企业研发的集中度和区位偏好,从而有针对性地对不同类型的企业组建研发集群提出相应的对策和建议。 The theory and experience both indicate that firms of different scales have different tendency to locate their R＆D activity. Large scales firms have fewer tendencies to agglomerate their R＆D activity than small firms. This paper firstly investigates the relationship between firms＂ scale and the extent of R＆D activity, research on the theoretic supposition. Finally on the basis of the conclusion, we also about how to bulid up the R＆D cluster for different firms.

作者韩剑

机构地区南京大学商学院

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第7期9-12,共4页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

关键词企业规模 R&D集聚研发集群 firm scale R＆D agglomeration R＆D cluster and put then makes an empirical forward some suggestion

分类号 F271 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献7

1Belderbos, R. and Carree, M. The location of Japanese investments in China: Agglomeration effects, keiretsu and firm heterogeneity [J]. Journal of Japanese and. International Economies, 2002(16): 194-211.
2Bronnenberg, Bart. J. Brand Competition in CPG Industries: Sustaining Large Local Advantages with Little Product Differentiation, http://ssrn.com/abstract=933201, 2006.
3Audretsch, D.B and MP, Feldman. Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation[C]. Prepared for the Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, 2003:75-85.
4Baranes, E. and Tropeano, JP. Why are technological spillovers spatially bounded? A market orientated approach [J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,2003(33):445-466.
5Fischer, W. and Frank, H. Innovation, Regional Knowledge Spillovers and R&D Cooperation [J].Research Policy,2004(33):245-255.
6魏江.小企业集群创新网络的知识溢出效应分析[J].科研管理,2003,24(4):54-60. 被引量：134
7徐现祥,舒元.物质资本、人力资本与中国地区双峰趋同[J].世界经济,2005,28(1):47-57. 被引量：62

二级参考文献34

1魏后凯.中国地区经济增长及其收敛性[J].中国工业经济,1997(3):31-37. 被引量：350
2[英]马歇尔.经济学原理中译本(下卷)[M].商务印书馆,1964年..
3Mu S. H., Hatfield, D. E., (2000), The Prevalence of the Silicon Valley Phenomena: An Intra - Industry Analysis of Geographic Clustering Behavior [R], Working Paper, Pamplin College of Business, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
4Nooteboom, B. (1999), Innovation, learning and industrial organisations, Cambridge Journal of Economics [J] 23:127 - 150.
5Porter, M. (1985), Competitive Advantage [M] New York: Free Press.
6Porter, M. (1998), On competition [M] Boston: Harvard business school press.
7Padmore T., Gibson, H., (1998) Modelling systems of innovation: Ⅱ. A framework for industrial cluster analysis in regions, Research Policy [J] 26:625-641.
8Rabellotti, Roberta & Schmitz, Hubert (1999), The internal heterogeneity of industrial districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico, Regianal Studies [J] 33(2): 97.
9Shilton, L. & Stanley, C. ( 1999), Spatial Patterns of Headquarters, Journal of Real Estate Research[J] 17(3):341-364.
10Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N. & Pinch, S. (1999),Knowledge clusters and competitive advantage in global industries[R]. Working paper presented in Strategic Management Society 1999 conference.