期刊文献+

信息系统问卷调查质量评估研究

Evaluation Survey Research in Management Information System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 系统的评估问卷调查研究质量是评价相关研究贡献程度的基础。在分析问卷调查研究的特点、展开研究的情境、类型的基础上,运用研究理论框架,探讨了研究实施过程中存在的七类误差;围绕各种误差,提出了一个研究质量评估框架;运用该框架评估了国内信息系统问卷调查研究,并给出了若干建议。 This paper attempts to provide an evaluation framework bridge the gap between survey research and theory development. on good The paper survey research practices and attempts to identified a set of ideal survey research attributes. Several research papers in Chinese academic journals are evaluated with respect to these attributes. Results of assessment indicate that survey research in China should pay more attention in methodological rigor in the future.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第7期63-66,74,共5页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会创新研究群体项目(70121001) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70372049)
关键词 信息系统 问卷调查研究 评估 management information system survey research evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Straub, D.W., Boudreau, M.C., Gefen, D. Validation guidelines for IS positivist research [J]. Communications of the AIS, 2004, 11(3): 380-427.
  • 2Kraemer, A.P., Survey research methodology in management information systems: An assessment [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1993, 10(2): 75-105.
  • 3艾尔.巴比著,邱泽奇译、社会研究方法[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005.6.
  • 4Hendrickson, M., Cronan, T.P. On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales [J]. MIS Quarterly, 1993, 17(2): 227-230.
  • 5Lee, E., Hu, M.Y. and Toh, R. S. Are consumer survey results distorted? Systematic impact of behavioral frequency and duration on survey response errors [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2000, 37(1): 125-133.
  • 6Yadav, M.S., How buyers evaluate product bundles: A model of anchoring and adjustment [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1994, 21(2): 342.
  • 7Churchill, G.A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, 16(1): 64-73.
  • 8Straub, D.W. Validating instruments in MIS research [J]. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13(2): 147-169.
  • 9Craik, K.H., et al. Explorations of construct validity in a combined managerial and personality assessment program [J]. Journal of Oeeupational & Organizational Psyehology, 2002, 75(2): 171-193.
  • 10Podsakoff, P.M., et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879.

共引文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部