期刊文献+

前列腺癌的流行病学特征及晚期一线内分泌治疗分析 被引量:121

Epidemiology of prostate cancer from three centers and analysis of the first-line hormonal therapy for the advanced disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析北京、上海、广州的三个中心前列腺癌的流行病学特征,初步反映中国发达地区的前列腺癌现状。对晚期前列腺癌患者内分泌治疗相关资料进行分析,寻找内分泌治疗效果以及生存预后的预测因子。方法收集三个中心525例前列腺癌患者的临资料,进行流行病学分析。并对其中272例资料完整的晚期前列腺癌患者的内分泌治疗效果以及生存预后进行分析。结果68.0%的患者确诊时已属于晚期,80.2%的患者以内分泌治疗为主要治疗手段。Gleason分值、有无骨转移和血清前列腺特异性抗原最低点是晚期前列腺癌疾病进展的独立预后因子。结论绝大多数患者在确诊时已经为疾病晚期,内分泌治疗是主要治疗方法。Gleason分值、有无骨转移和PSA最低点是晚期前列腺癌疾病进展的独立预后因子。 Objectives To analyze the epidemiology information of prostate cancer from three centers of Bejing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and to reflect the current situation of prostate cancer in China, and to analyze the information of 272 patients with advanced prostate cancer who received hormonal therapy to find the prognostic factors of hormone therapy. Methods Collect the information of 525 patients with prostate cancer from three centers. Two hundred and seventy-two cases of advanced prostate cancer with full information were selected from the 525 cases to analyze the prognostic factors of hormone therapy. Results Three hundred and fifty-seven cases (68.0%) had advanced disease at diagnosis and 80. 2% patients received hormone therapy as the main therapy, Prognostic analysis indicated that Gleason score, bone metastasis and prostate specific antigen nadir were independent prognostic factors of progression-free survival time. Conclusions In this report, most patients are advanced prostate cancer at diagnose, and hormonal therapy is the main therapy. Gleason score, bone metastasis, prostate specific antigen nadir are independent prognostic factors of advanced prostate cancer after hormone therapy.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第12期921-925,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 前列腺癌 流行病学 内分泌治疗 预后 Prostate cancer Epidemiology Hormonal therapy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55:74-108.
  • 2Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin, 2006, 56:106-130.
  • 3邵常霞,项永兵,刘振伟,高静,孙璐,方茹蓉,阮志贤,高立峰,金凡,高玉堂.上海市区泌尿系统恶性肿瘤相对生存率分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(6):321-324. 被引量:31
  • 4Michael PM, Bernard D, Kaill M, et al. Management of prostate cancer in China: a multicenter report of 6 institutions. J Urol, 2005, 174:1794-1797.
  • 5肖序仁,史立新,洪宝发,叶林阳,张磊,蔡伟,高江平,王晓雄,李炎唐.前列腺癌治疗方法与生存预后的分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(2):95-99. 被引量:32
  • 6Murphy AM, McKiernan JM, Olsson CA. Controversies in prostate cancer screening. J Urol, 2004, 172 : 1822-1827.
  • 7Benaim EA, Pace CM, Roehrbor CG. Gleason score predicts androgen independent progression after androgen deprivation therapy. Eur Urel, 2002, 42:12-17.
  • 8Benaim EA, Pace CM, Lam PM, et al. Nadir PSA as a progression to androgeindependent prostate cancer. Urology, 2002, 59:73-77.
  • 9Siddall JK, Hetherington JW, Cooper EH, et al. Biochemical monitoring of carcinoma of prostate treated with an LRH analogue (Zoladex). Br J Urol, 1986, 58:676-679.
  • 10Mulders PF, Fernandez del MP, Theeuwes AG, et al. Value of biochemical markers in the management of disseminated prostatic cancer. Eur Urol, 1992, 21:2-7.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Fleshner NE, Herr HW, Stewart AK, et al. The National Data Base Report on bladder carcinoma. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society[J]. Cancer, 1996, 78(7): 1505~1513
  • 2Gatta G, Capocaccia R, Coleman MP, et al. Toward a comparison of survival in American and European cancer patients [J].Cancer, 2000, 89(4): 893~900
  • 3Post PN, Damhuis RA, Meyden AP, et al. Variation in survival of patients with prostate cancer in Eruope since 1978 [J]. Eur JCancer, 1998, 34(14 Spec No): 2226~2231
  • 4Hakulinen T, Abeywickrama KH. A computer program package for relative survival analysis [J]. Computer Programs Biomed,1985, 19(2-3):197~207
  • 5George R, Margaret N, Peter G, et al. Survival Experience of Black Patients and White Patients with Bladder Carcinoma [J].Cancer, 2004, 100(3): 621~630
  • 6Teppo L, Dickman PW, Hakulinen T, et al. Cancer patient survival, patterns, comparisons, trends: a population-based cancer registry study in Finland [J]. Acta Oncologica, 1999, 38 (3): 283~294
  • 7Richants M, Stochton D, Babb P, et al. How many deaths have been avoided through improvement in cancer survival? [J]. Br MedJ, 2000, 320(7239):895~898
  • 8Prout GR, Wesley MN, Greenberg RS, et al. Bladder cancer: race differences in extent of disease at diagnosis [J]. Cancer, 2000, 89(6): 1349~1358
  • 9陈建国,沈卓才,姚红玉,李文广.恶性肿瘤16922例生存率分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1998,20(3):202-206. 被引量:46
  • 10项永兵.肿瘤流行病学研究资料的统计分析第六讲相对生存率的统计学检验[J].中华流行病学杂志,1999,20(2):122-124. 被引量:25

共引文献61

同被引文献930

引证文献121

二级引证文献1047

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部