期刊文献+

液体推进剂公路运输泄漏风险的模糊综合评价 被引量:12

An innovated fuzzy overall evaluation model for liquid-leakage risks in highway transportation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对液体推进剂在公路运输中泄漏事故发生的多样性、复杂性和不确定性等特点,建立公路运输偏二甲肼(UDMH)的泄漏事故模型。通过层次分析法确定各影响因素的权重,运用模糊综合评价思想对液体推进剂在公路运输中的泄漏风险进行了评价。结果表明,液体推进剂在公路运输中的泄漏风险为第2等级,风险较大;其影响因素中安全管理所占的权重最大,其次为运输设备状况、人员素质、运输中充装过量和路况,相关单位可依此排序制定预防措施。 The present article intends to introduce an innovated fuzzy overall evaluation model for liquid-leakage risks in highway transportation. Liquid propellants, widely used in the spaceflight area, have their own particular features, such as strong causticity, toxicity, inflammability, explosibility and so on, are prone to some special hazards in the course of transportation. In view of diversified and uncertain causes leading to their leakage during highway transportation, the paper has established an evaluation model of the UDMH transportation risks. For the convenience of easier categorization, we have analyzed the commonly observed causes that are likely leading to the above said transportation hazards, we have classified such risk-involving incidents into 5 categories, such as safety administration, transportation and traffic containers or other facilities, over-loading, human operational inability, road qualities as well as the environmental conditions. And for the sake of analysis convenience, each of the above said risk-laden factors can be put into the evaluation factors or index system. And all the fuzzy membership degree of the factors or indexes have been weighed and confirmed by a group of experts, and then calculated in accordance with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Based on the above calculation, the overall evaluation method has been established on the fuzzy mathematic theory so as to evaluate the risk degrees. The evaluation results we have done indicate that the risk degree is the second, which means a "bigger" risk and a hazard process. Our evaluation results can be extended to other liquid propellants so as to make it known that more attention should be paid to the safety transportation. What is more, since the factor or index weighing and calculation of the safety administration aspect is usually higher than other aspects, with the mutual influence of the likely risk-causing factors interacting with each other, the key point to reduce the transportation leakage is to improve and perfect the transportation system and the security organization. At the same time, the inspection and maintain of the tragic facilities are also important for their safe transportation, as well as the enhancement of the handling skills of human resources and the road perambulation before the task.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 2008年第3期158-161,共4页 Journal of Safety and Environment
关键词 航空、航天科学技术其他学科 液体推进剂 偏二甲肼 公路运输 泄漏 模糊综合评价 层次分析法 other disciplines of aerospace science and technology liquid propellant UDMH highway transportation leakage fuzzy overall evaluation analytic hierarchy process
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献14

  • 1金承尧,赵建平.基于RBI方法的在役安全阀风险评价技术研究[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,26(5):25-29. 被引量:22
  • 2李强,刘学文,袁祖贻,袁振明.焊接质量的模糊综合评判[J].北方交通大学学报,1996,20(4):445-448. 被引量:1
  • 3冯德益.模糊数学及方法[M].北京:地震出版社,1983.35-150.
  • 4国防科国委后勤部. 火箭推进剂检测防护与污染治理[M]. 长沙:国防科技大学出版社,1993.
  • 5佘廉,戴行信,洪元义.中国交通灾害[M],长沙:湖南人民出版社,1997.19-45.
  • 6William R Rhyne.Hazardous material transportation risk analysis:quantitative approaches for truck and train[M].New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold,1994.
  • 7Nicolet-Monnier Michel,Gheorghe Adrian V.Quantitative risk assessment of hazardous materials transport systems:rail,road,pipelines,and ship[M].Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1996.
  • 8赵建平,沈士明.模糊综合评价法在埋地燃气管道第三方破坏评价中的应用[C]//江苏省科学技术协会,中国安全生产科学研究院.第二届城市与工业安全国际会议论文集.南京:东南大学出版社,2005.
  • 9李战奇,朱建明.模糊评价系统中隶属函数构造与修正[J].中国矿业,1998,7(5):68-71. 被引量:3
  • 10张启平,吕武轩,麻德贤.突发性危险气体泄放过程智能仿真[J].中国安全科学学报,1998,8(6):35-39. 被引量:16

共引文献100

同被引文献99

引证文献12

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部