1Garfield E. Classic Papers from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Part 1. Each Year' s Most-Cited Paper, 1955 - 1984--And Then Some. Essays of an Information Scientist, 1987, 10 : 247 - 255
2Garfield E. Classic Papers from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Part 2. Absolutely, the 50 Most-Cited Almost. Essays of an Info~tion Scientist, 1987, 10:256 -262
3Cozzarelli Nicholas R. Introduction to "From the Academy". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94:1605
4Fersht A. How and why to publish in PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102:6241 -6242
5Bogorad L. About the Proceedings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1995, 92: i-ii
6Cozzarelli N R. An open access option for PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101:8509
4Schekman R. Charting the course for PNAS[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(USA),2008,(08):2755-2756.
5Fersht A. How and why to publish in PNAS[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(USA),2005,(18):6241-6242.
6Rand D G,Pfeiffer T. Systematic differences in impact across publication tracks at PNAS[J].PLoS ONE,2009,(12):e8092.
7Schekman R. Introducing feature articles in PNAS[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(USA),2007,(16):6495.
8Schekman R. PNAS will eliminate communicated submissions in July 2010[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(USA),2009,(37):15518.
9Kean S. PNAS Nixes special privileges for (most) papers[J].Science,2009,(5947):1486-1487.
10Schekman R. Creating a new option for online-only research articles:PNAS Plus[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(USA),2010,(35):15309.
