摘要
《金瓶梅词话》"借宋写明",但在写"明"时作者往往选择明代不止一朝独有的事件,例如朝廷违法借支"马价银",或不止一朝独有的人物,例如"张龙"等来安排情节,表面上模棱两可,使人捉摸不定,但在关键处作品是有严格界定的。我们在明白了《金瓶梅》这种独特的艺术手法后,又结合明代最原始真实的史料《明实录》,即可判定《金瓶梅词话》中朝廷违法借支"马价银"指的是正德、嘉靖时期而绝不是万历时期,进而证实《金瓶梅》所反映的时代。
Discourse of Jinpingmei (Plum in Golden Vase)depicts Ming by Song dynasty in relation to the displacement of the expressions. They appear indefinite, but strict in certain contexts. The writer of this paper argues that by the artistic features of the Jinpingmei(Plum in Golden Vase) and Records of Ming the discourse of money borrowing in Discourse of Jinpingmei (Plum in Golden Vase) should refer to the Zhengde and Jiajing, but not Wanli.
出处
《河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2008年第4期110-114,共5页
Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
《金瓶梅词话》
借支马价银
时代考证
Discourse of Jinpingmei (Plum in Golden Vase)
money borrowiug
historical study