3Baum. F. Researching Public Health: Behind the Quantitative-Quantitative Methodological Debate[ J]. Social Science & Medicine. vol. 40. 1995, (4) :468.
二级参考文献11
1巴甫洛夫选集,科学出版社,1955年版,第154页.
2VIADERO D. 'Mixed Methods' research examined researchers see pros and cons of 'Mixed Methods' studies[N]. Education Week, 2005-01-26(20).
3JOHNSON. R B, ONWUEGBUZIE A J. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come[J]. Educational Researcher, 2004, (33) : 12-26.
4HOWE K R, Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis, or, dogmas die hard[j], Education Researcher, 1992, (17) : 10-16.
5TASHAKKORI A, TEDDIAE C. Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches[A]. Applied Social Research Methods Series[C]. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage. 1998,(46).
6ONWUEGBUZIE A J, TEDDLIE, C. A Framework for Analyzing Data in Mixed methods In Social and Behavioral Research[M]. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage,2003. 351-383.
7GREENE J C, CARACELLI V J, GRAHAM W F.Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation design[J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989, (11) :255-274.
8SECHREST L, SIDANA S, Quantitative and qualitative research methods: is there an alternative? [J].Evaluation Program Planning, 1995, (18) : 77-87.
9TIERNEY W G,JUN A, A university helps prepare low income youths for eollege[J]. The Journal of Higher Education, 2001, (72): 205-225.
