论金融诈骗罪的客观构成形态

On the Objective Constitutional Morphology of the Crime of Financial Fraud

金融诈骗罪在立法上究竟是以结果犯为模式还是以行为犯为模式,学界存在着激烈的争论。越来越多的学者主张采用"抽象的危险构成要件"立法技术,但"危险犯概念是一个危险的概念",需慎用。还有学者认为使用预备犯理论完全可以实现相同效果,但预备犯是一个比抽象危险犯更加"危险"的概念,这种观点看似务实,却不可行。基于对金融诈骗罪法益的重新定位,本类罪立法应当维持结果犯的模式。

There are heated arguments about whether the legislation of financial fraud crime should be based on the model of result crime or act crime. More and more scholars prefer to adopt the legislation of＂ abstract composing element of danger＂, but the concept of danger crime is a dangerous concept which must be applied cautiously. Some other scholars think that the theory of preparatory crime can also achieve the same result but it is a more dangerous concept than the abstract danger crime. It seems practical,but actually infeasible. Based on the new positioning of the legal interest of financial fraud crimes, the legislation model of result crime of this type of crimes should be maintained.