期刊文献+

药敏试验 E test 法与琼脂扩散法的方法学比较 被引量:6

Comparison of a new antimicrobial susceptibility test,E test with disk diffusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 介绍一种新的药敏试验Etest(ABBiodisk,Solna,Sweden)法,并与常用的纸片扩散法进行比较。Etest法系利用琼脂扩散法的原理,把一载有抗生素连续指数梯度浓度的5×50mm的塑料条放于已接种菌液的琼脂板上,此条包含15个log2的稀释倍数,从抑菌环与载体条交界处可定量读出MIC值。分别用Etest和纸片扩散法测定了临床分离的310株革兰氏阴性杆菌对10种抗生素的敏感性。结果显示Etest与纸片扩散法的一致性达90.1%,相关性在0.75~0.93之间,平均为0.87,以Etest法为标准计算纸片扩散法的平均极大误差为1.5%,大误差为2.6%。结论认为Etest是一种精确可靠的药敏方法;常规纸片扩散法必须严格按照标准化进行。 Objectives to introduce a new technique for antimicrobial susceptibility testing,Etest(AB Biodisk,Solna,Sweden),and compare it with routine disk diffusion method.Methods Etest uses diffusion principle,and places a plastic strip(5 by 50mm) with a continuous concentration antimicrobic gradient on inoculated agar plate.The strip has 15 twofold dilution,and MICs are read where the edge of the inhibition zone intersects the strip.We compared the Etest with disk diffusion by using clinically isolated 310 strains to 10 antimicrobial agents.Results The Etest category agreement with disk diffusion was 90.1%,the correlation coefficient was 0.87,ranged from 0.75 to 0.93.As the Etest was standard,the very major error of disk diffusion was 1.5%,the major error was 2.6%.Conclusions Etest was a accurate and reliable method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing,through it some problems were found in routine antimicrobial susceptibility test.
出处 《中华微生物学和免疫学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1997年第3期172-175,共4页 Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology
关键词 微生物 敏感性试验 方法 抗生素类 Microbial sensitivity tests/methods Antibiotics
  • 相关文献

同被引文献61

引证文献6

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部