期刊文献+

华南奥陶纪末大灭绝后腕足动物是否存在“小型化效应”? 被引量:2

DOES "LILLIPUT EFFECT" OF BRACHIOPODS EXIST IN SOUTH CHINA AFTER THE LATE ORDOVICIAN MASS EXTINCTION?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 小型化效应(Lilliput effect)一般是指灭绝事件后生物个体相对于事件前明显变小的一种演化现象。为了更深入研究,文中将它分为狭义与广义两种类型:狭义型是指它的原始定义,专门针对种级分类单元的小型化,因研究条件苛刻而导致相关研究很少;广义型是指高于种级分类单元的小型化,已有一些实例。文章对华南奥陶纪末大灭绝前后"Katian晚期"、"Hirnantian"及"Rhuddanian初期"3个时期的腕足动物个体大小数据,依"属"、"超科"及"目"3级分类单元有选择地进行比较。分析结果表明,奥陶纪末大灭绝后残存期里较低级分类单元(属级)在个体大小变化方面显示较大的差异性,这与二叠纪末大灭绝后普遍的小型化有很大差别,这可能是因为奥陶纪末的灭绝强度远低于后者所致;同一较高级分类单元中不同属级分子个体变化趋势表现出较为一致的现象,反映出它们可能具有相似的灾难应对机制。 In the immediate aftermath of mass extinction, organisms are typically much smaller than during pre-extinction times. This evolutionary phenomenon is named "Lilliput effect". For indepth research, the effect is divided into two types: the special type, refers to the original definition of the effect which aims at species level, but it is too strict to prove; the general type, with some cases which related to higher taxa than species level. This study compares body size of the brachiopods from South China through the Ordovi clan mass extinction (late Katian, Hirnantian, earliest Rhuddanian three time intervals) at "generic", "super familial" and "ordinal" levels. The result indicates that the body sizes of the lower taxa (generic level) are highly variable, which is different from the Lilliput effect from end Permian mass extinction because the intensity of the end Ordovielan mass extinction is much less than the latter. The consistency of the variation in some higher taxa possibly suggests that the braehiopods from the same higher taxon have similar surviving strategies.
作者 黄冰
出处 《古生物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期203-213,共11页 Acta Palaeontologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(No 40772002) 中国科学院资源环境领域知识创新工程重要方向项目( KZCX3-SW-149) 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2006CB806400)联合资助
关键词 小型化效应 大灭绝 残存 奥陶纪 华南 Lilliput effect, mass extinction, survive, Ordovician, South China
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Barbault R, 1988. Body size, ecological constraints and the evolution of life-history strategies. Evolutionary Biology, 22: 261-286.
  • 2Chen Z Q, Kaiho K, George A D, 2005. Survival strategies of brachiopod faunas from the end-Permian mass extinction. Palaeogeography, Palaeocllmatology, Palaeoecology 2,24: 232-269.
  • 3Cotgreave P, 1993. The relationship between body size and population abundance in animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8: 244-248.
  • 4Fara E, 2001. What are Lazarus taxa? Geological Journal, 36(3-4) : 291-303.
  • 5Girard C, Renaud S, 1996. Size variations in conodonts in response to the upper Kellwasser crisis (upper Devonian of the Montagne Noire, France). Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Scrie IIa, 323: 435-442.
  • 6Hallam A, 1975. Evolutionary size increase and longevity in Jurassic bivalves and ammonites. Nature, 258: 493-496.
  • 7Harper D A T, 1984. Brachiopods from the Upper Ardmillan succession (Ordovician) of the Girvan District, Scotland. Part 1. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 136: 1-78.
  • 8Harries P J, Kauffman E G, Hansen T A, 1996. Models for biotic survival following mass extinction. In: Hart M B (ed.), Biotic recovery from mass extinction events. 102. London: Geological Society Special Publication. 41-60.
  • 9Hayami I, 1998. Ecology of mass extinctions: the diversity and shell size of bivalves through time. Iden, 52: 38-44.
  • 10He W H, Shi G R, Feng Q L etal. , 2007. Brachiopod miniaturization and its possible causes during the Permian-Triassic crisis in deep water environments, South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 252: 145-163.

同被引文献43

  • 1曾庆銮,胡昌铭.江西玉山王家坝早志留世早期(Early Llandoverian)新腕足动物群的发现及其意义[J].古生物学报,1997,36(1):1-17. 被引量:6
  • 2Alvarez S G, Juaristi C M, Gutierez J S et al., 2009. Taxonomic differences between Pinus sylvestris and P. uncinata revealed in the stomata and cuticle characters for use in the study of fossil material. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 155 (1-2) : 61-68.
  • 3Bassett M G, 1974. The articulate brachiopods fom the Wenlock series of the Welsh Borderland and South Wales, Part 3. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society,128:79-22.
  • 4Candela Y, 2003. Late Ordovician brachiopods from the Bardahessiagh Formation of Pomeroy, Ireland. Monographs of the Palaeontographieal Society, 156 : 1-95.
  • 5Chen Xi-ru(陈希孺),1981.Introduction of Mathematical Statistics.Beijing:Science Press. 1-376(in Chinese).
  • 6Cocks L R M, 1968. Some strophomenacean brachiopods from the British Lower Silurian. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology, 15:283-324.
  • 7Cocks L R M, 2005. Strophomenate brachiopods from the late Ordovician Boda Limestone of Sweden: Their systematics and implications for palaeogeography. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology,3(3) :243-282.
  • 8Cocks L R M, 2008a. The Middle Llandovery brachiopod fauna of the Newlands Formation, Girvan, Scotland. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology,6(1):61-100.
  • 9Cocks L R M,2008b. A revised review of British Lower Palaeozoic brachiopods. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, 161 (296):1-276.
  • 10Cocks L R M,Rong J Y,2000. Strophomenida. In: Kaesler R L, (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, Part H, Brachiopoda (revised). 2. Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas:The Geological Society of America,Inc. and the University of Kansas. 216-349.

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部