1[1]David V. An in vitro comparative study of the amount of remnant adhesives in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Thesis, Iowa City : University of Iowa, 1998. 116~118
2[2]Corey CC, Robert NS, Jane J. Bond strength of a resin modified glass ionomer with five orthodontic brackets. J Clin Orthod, 2000,34 : 286
3[3]Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res,1955, 34:849
4[4]Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: Progress report. Am J Orthod,1965,51 :901
5[5]Dickinson PT, Power JM. Evaluation of fourteen direct bonding orthodontic bases. Am J Orthod, 1980,78:630
6[6]Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment base. Am J Orthod,1980 , 77 : 669
7[8]Reynolds IR, Von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding in orthodontics: A comparison of attachment. Br J Orthod, 1977,4:65
8[9]Norevall LI, Marcusson A, Person M. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. Eur J Orthod,1996 ,18 : 373
9[10]Nigel A. A Critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod,1994,21 :33
9Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod. 1999;26(4): 285- 290.
10Whitlock BO 3rd, Eick JD, Ackerman RJ Jr, et al.Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106(4):358-364.