期刊文献+

如何分析评价毒理学实验结果 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 化学物质的毒理学研究的结果在化学品和食品、药品、农药、化妆品和消毒品等健康相关产品的安全性评价中被广泛采用,其结果成为制定卫生标准、技术规范和行政许可的重要依据。从管理学角度看,采取行政措施必须与社会总体经济发展的需求相适应,能够平衡社会各方面的利益才能有效实施。因此,化学物质的管理措施是否正确在很大程度上取决于毒理学实验结果的合理性。
作者 邓海 魏一大
出处 《中华预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期482-484,共3页 Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1卡萨瑞特·道尔.毒理学-毒物的基础科学.6版.黄吉武,周宗灿译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:999-1009.
  • 2中国合格评定国家认可委员会.检测和校准实验室能力认可准则,CNAS-CID1,5.9检测和校准结果质量保证,2006.
  • 3Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals, 408 Subchronic Oral Toxicity- Rodent: 90-day Studies, Paris: OECD, Adopted: 12, 1981:1-9.
  • 4Hatoum NS, Leach CL, Talmsa DM, et al. A statistical basis for using fewer rabbits in dermal irritation testing. J Amer Coll Toxicol, 1990, 9 : 49-59.
  • 5Gaer DM. A testing battery for evaluating occupational health hazards. J Amer Coll Toxicol, 1989, 8: 1215.

同被引文献21

  • 1菅小东,周红,高映新.国际化学品安全管理的现状及发展趋势[J].环境科学研究,2004,17(3):7-9. 被引量:17
  • 2KlimischH J,Andreae M,Tillmann U. A systematic approach forevaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicologicaldata[J]. Regulat Toxicol P harm acol,1997,25(1):1-5.
  • 3Przybylak KR,Madden JC,Cronin M T ,et al. Assessing toxicologicaldata quality: basic principles,existing schemes and current limitations[J]. SAR and QSAR Environ R e s,2 0 1 2 ,2 3 (5 /6 ): 435-459.
  • 4Schneider K,Schwarz M,Burkholder I , e t al. “ToxRTool” , a newtool to assess the reliability of toxicological data[J]. Toxicol L ett,2009,189(2):138-144.
  • 5Hulzebos E,Gunnarsdottir S ,R ila J , e t al. An integrated assessmentscheme for assessing the adequacy of (eco)toxicological data underREACH[J]. Toxicol L e tt,2 0 1 0 ,1 9 8 (2 ):255-262.
  • 6Segal D,Makris SL,Kraft A D , e t al. Evaluation of the ToxRTool’sability to rate the reliability of toxicological data for human health hazardassessments[J]. Regul Toxicol Pharm acol,2015,72(1):94-101.
  • 7Baker NC,Knudsen TB,Crofton KM. High-throughput electronicliteraturelibraries (e-libraries) to support development of toxicityprediction models andadverse outcome pathways (AOPs)[J]. Toxicologist,2013,132(1):184.
  • 8Wongpakaran N,Wongpakaran T,W edding D , e t al. A comparison ofCohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliabilitycoefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples[J].BMC Med Res M eth od ,2013,13(1):1-7.
  • 9Hallgren KA. Computing inter-rater reliability for observationaldata: an overview and tutorial[J]. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol,2 0 1 2 ,8 (1 ):23-34.
  • 10Krauth D, Woodruff TJ, Bero L. Instruments for assessing risk of bias andother methodological criteria of published animal studies : a systematicreview[J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2013, 121(9): 985-992.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部