期刊文献+

安氏Ⅰ类错不同垂直骨面型下颌骨形态的比较研究 被引量:9

Morphometric study of the mandible shape of the subjects with Class Ⅰ skeletal pattern in the three verticle facial types
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的用几何形态测量法对不同垂直骨面型下颌骨的形态特征进行比较研究。方法随机选取安氏Ⅰ类错高角、低角和均角儿童的头颅定位侧位片各30张,扫描侧位片后数字化下颌骨的8个标志点,用Procrustes重叠法得出三种下颌骨的平均形状,然后用薄板曲线法和EDMA法比较安氏Ⅰ类错不同垂直骨面型下颌骨的形态特征。结果从低角到高角,下颌骨的形态改变趋势如下:①下颌升支逐渐变短;②下颌角逐渐增大;③颏部逐渐向后向下旋转;④Id-Pg距逐渐增大;⑤Ar点相对于Co点由后向前移位。结论不同垂直骨面型下颌骨的形态存在很大差异。 Objective To investigate the differences of mandible shapes of the subjects with Class I skeletal pattern in the three verticle facial types by geometric morphometrics. Methods The pretreatment lateral cephalograps of 90 skeletal Class I patients (30 hypodivergent, 30 hyperdivergent, 30 normodivergent )were selected randomly. All cephalographs were scanned, and eight homologous mandibular landmarks were identified and digitized. Average mandibular geometries were generated by means of Procrustes analysis. Thin - plate spline analysis and EDMA was then applied to mandibular configurations to determine local form differences between the three divergent classes. Results With increase of the MP - SN angle, as shown below, the mandblur shape had some changes- gonion angle and the distance of Id -Pg increased, the ramus height reduced, the chin rotated downward and backward, Ar piont relative to Co point moved farward. Conclusion Mandibular shape was different in the three divergent classes.
出处 《现代口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期239-242,共4页 Journal of Modern Stomatology
关键词 垂直骨面型 下颌骨 几何形态测量法 Verticle facial type Mandible Geometric morphometfics
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1邹冰爽,曾祥龙,傅民魁.高角和低角病例的诊断、临床特征及正畸治疗特点[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1999,15(1):39-42. 被引量:71
  • 2Ferrario VF,Sforza C,De Franco DJ.Mandibular shape and skeletal divergency.Eur J Orthod,1999,21(2):145-153.
  • 3Singh GD,McNamara JA Jr,Lozanoff S.Procrustes,Euclidean and cephalometric analyses of the morphology of the mandible in human Class III malocclusions.Arch Oral Biol,1998,43(7):535-543.
  • 4Kendall DG.A survey of the statistical theory of shape.Statist Sci,1989,4(2):87-120.
  • 5Robinson DL,Blackwell PG,Stillman EC,et al.Planar Procrustes analysis of tooth shape.Arch Oral Biol,2001,46(3):191-199.
  • 6McIntyre GT,Mossey PA.Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics.Eur J Orthod,2003,25(3):231-242.
  • 7Chang HP,Liu PH,YangYH,et al.Craniofacial morphometric analysis of mandibular prognathism.Oral Rehabil,2006,33(3):183-193.
  • 8Siriwat PP,Jarabak JR.Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study.Angle Orthod,1985,55(2):127-138.
  • 9Karlsen AT.Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN angle males:a longitudinal study.Angle Orthod,1995,65(5):341-350.
  • 10Richtsmeier JT,Cheverud JM.Finite element scaling analysis of human craniofacial growth.Craniofac Genet Dev Biol,1986,6(3):289-323.

共引文献70

同被引文献126

引证文献9

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部